Humans Demand Exploitation - the Chromium Example.

[SkyNigger]

On Google+, there was this rant that went for hundreds of posts about how Evil Facebook is for doing things like this:

http://www.theregister.co.uk/2012/07/02/facebook_contact_push/

Facebook has found an innovative way to encourage use of its email service: reach into users' mobile phone address books and change the email addresses stored against each contact to their Facebook email account.

Seems unethical but pretty tame compared to some of the genuine horror going on. This is basically the Human Problem, as it stands.

http://reface.me/wp-content/uploads/julian-assange-vs-mark-zuckerberg.jpg

But the Google+ users were all like "This is why Google should be trusted. They Do No Evil, etc."

Google do a lot of evil. But then I don't blame Google for the evil Toddlers force them to do. I understand why Toddlers are exploited. I think I've always known, on some level, that the exploitation of imbeciles is almost always their fault unless they're a child being exploited by creeps.

Google's intentions are likely a great deal more honourable than humans permit, because humans literally demand to be exploited.

We scream like toddlers when something doesn't 'work'. A year ago, a new Chromium release brought in a new security feature which interrupted downloads where the web servers had incorrectly specified content-lengths of downloads.

The official Chrome explanation to users:

Some servers will send a Content-Length which exceeds the number of bytes sent in the message body. Some web sites set it to an incorrect value. If it is smaller than the data being sent, we set it to 0 internally (meaning we don't know the size of the data). If it is larger than the data being sent, then it presents a potential attack vector.

Although this violates the RFC spec, other major browsers permit it and treat a download as complete in that case. Chrome did as well prior to M12, and now some users are unable to access the item that they downloaded.

Do you think users said "Thank you Google for protecting us from those who Do Evil?"

Nah. They threw tantrums, ranted at Chromium for interrupting their unsafe downloads. They threatened that if the 'bug' wasn't fixed, they would go back to FF and IE (who weren't protecting them).

The Chromium guys made the case for why it wasn't a 'bug'. I wasn't all that technical but it seemed pretty fucking clear-cut to me. I read in horror as Chromium weakened under the pressure...more and more users were threatening to go back to FF and IE where downloads "just worked"...under more and more pressure, with the sane arguments of a few posters being drowned out by the screams of petulant imbeciles, Chromium techs started bending first 'accepting' it as a 'bug'...and I laughed in derision when Chromium finally snapped under the pressure; giving in to the demands of toddler humans who demanded to _not_ be protected from what amounts to [incompetence at best, malice at worst]. All users cared about was their accessing their corrupted downloads. Imbeciles made arguments about Google infringing on their liberty. It was surreal.

http://media.tumblr.com/tumblr_m33naeXGNX1r1i9kx.png

They've literally done this. They've made humans this narcissistic.

If you're genuinely confused about why companies like Facebook exploit imbeciles, you should read this Chromium 'bug' report page: http://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=85549

It really just explains everything about the Human Problem.

The Human Problem is your ignorance and apathy and your toddler threats where you levy demands for your own exploitation. You'll just go with whomever insults you more brazenly, that's what you appreciate and respect. You'll allow Cpl Manning to be imprisoned for years without being charged, tortured for all you know or care, and you'll gobble up Zuckerberg's exploitation of your unfathomable ignorance by buying into his IPO. You worship those who exploit you just "because we can". It happened when I exploited you.

Oh sure Toddlers will whine and complain when they get abused; they'll cry and scream and gnash their teeth when their children are killed (they're blissfully quiet when they are killed though, I kinda appreciate that on some level) but not only will Toddlers tolerate their exploitation, they literally demand to be exploited. How can those who might want to "Do No Evil" compete when you don't let them be competitive unless they allow Evil?

Google buckled. I think they pretty much had to. The Final Solution to the Human Problem with the Security Feature that wasn't a bug:

The latest Dev version of Chrome (14.0.797.0) changes the logic of download interrupt detection, as does the latest Canary.

They changed the logic. It's what all the human toddlers wanted, demanded and threatened Google in order to get. The market spoke. And the logic was changed.

They changed the logic back to illogical.

I think I gave up on Humanity that day. 

[gay sex]

uhhhhhhhhhhhh ohhhh scuters been watching the matrix again

[Hillbilly Jim]

get real the matrix is fake as shit
however im pretty sure im being truman showed yall

[MistaCobalina]

Being a shut in isn't the same as being truman showed, nerdwinkle

[DankBlaniels]

scoots magoots is a robot from the future

[DankBlaniels]

thats why his electronics dont work its because the computer chips in his head mess with the signal

[Statutory Ape]

I literally fled facebook last october or so and haven't looked back, not even on my birthday. Fuck that vile creepy shit, I want it nowhere near me or any electronic devices I have. The clincher for me was when I read the air force had a small army of fake people who are bots that go around befriending people and acting/speaking like they are from whatever area they claim and try to network around, collecting information on everyone they come in contact with.

Facebook acknowledged this, people didn't care. I get laughed at by my friends for even mentioning it, like how could I be upset, what do I have to hide?

The fuck is wrong with people? It's not about whether you are a bad person or not, it's about YOUR FUCKING PRIVACY and not being ok with the government trampling all over our damned rights by doing CREEPY CREEPY SHIT. SHIT LIKE HAVING AN ARMY OF FAKE HUMAN BEINGS ON FACEBOOK COLLECTING DATA AND CHANGING YOUR CONTACTS IN YOUR CELL PHONE, YA KNOW

CREEPY VILE SHIT LIKE THAT

AM I THE ONLY SANE PERSON IN THIS GODFORSAKEN WORLD??????

[Hillbilly Jim]

Being a shut in isn't the same as being truman showed, nerdwinkle

youve just been shut out bullwinkle

[anatine]

what a shock, ape fled from something instead of knuckling down and getting good at it.

[Statutory Ape]

getting good at facebook?

does not compute

[Hillbilly Jim]

you nerds kept going on and on about chrome so i downloaded it and it sucks bro
i only keep using it so i dont lose street cred

[Steerpike]

the ape is plenty capable of knuckling down

[Statutory Ape]

you nerds kept going on and on about chrome so i downloaded it and it sucks bro
i only keep using it so i dont lose street cred

Chrome is by far the best browser, name one better?

[Statutory Ape]

the ape is plenty capable of knuckling down

http://www.personal.psu.edu/afr3/blogs/SIOW_Reflections/2010/11/27/chimpanzee_thinking_poster.jpg

[Steerpike]

i meant when you walk mike, when you walk

[Statutory Ape]

i meant when you walk mike, when you walk

it's called knuckle-walking all the cool kids in school are doing it these days

[Statutory Ape]

Just an hour ago I ran this by my mother, she replies "Oh yeah, I heard...something about that. That facebook is doing something weird"

I explain what exactly is going on, her response "oh well, i don't log in to facebook from my phone, I'm not worried about it"

The fuck? How can someone miss the damned point by so much? Anyone with common sense would read the article Scuter posted and want NOTHING to do with facebook for the rest of his or her life.

As I did, last october....

[SkyNigger]

im pretty sure im being truman showed yall

You motherfuckers would be so bored if I was Truman. Your nigger faults for not writing me better love interest scripts imo.

scoots magoots is a robot from the future

Also possible.

thats why his electronics dont work its because the computer chips in his head mess with the signal

Not possible. I never had a computer problem in my life until I started writing about child exploitation and emotional manipulation in early 2010.

The clincher for me was when I read the air force had a small army of fake people who are bots that go around befriending people and acting/speaking like they are from whatever area they claim and try to network around, collecting information on everyone they come in contact with.

Bots? Do you mean dupes?

What possible motive could there be for this but to fool imbeciles into forgetting the fact that the US government has ALL your Facebook data. Stop kidding yourself. If it goes online, they have it. You have no idea about their technological capacities because they keep that shit hidden from you on a Need to Know basis.

And for all you know, everyone could be answerable to the Vatican. In fact, I'm yet to hear a logical case made for why the Treaty of Westphalia (the creation not of nation-states but of illusions which were answerable to the Holy Roman Emperor, by LAW) has silently been annulled as Law.

Facebook acknowledged this, people didn't care. I get laughed at by my friends for even mentioning it, like how could I be upset, what do I have to hide?

What is it with you and FAILURE TO PROVIDE VERIFICATION? Huh? Are you malfunctioning? Do you know how moronic it is to make a statement like this and not provide the link?

Provide the fucking link. Not in the future. Provide the links to your bullshit now.

The fuck is wrong with people? It's not about whether you are a bad person or not, it's about YOUR FUCKING PRIVACY and not being ok with the government trampling all over our damned rights by doing CREEPY CREEPY SHIT. SHIT LIKE HAVING AN ARMY OF FAKE HUMAN BEINGS ON FACEBOOK COLLECTING DATA AND CHANGING YOUR CONTACTS IN YOUR CELL PHONE, YA KNOW

Changing the emails in your account is fucked up but makes perfect commercial sense.

An army of fake? (what does that mean?) human beings (is there such a thing) on Facebook collecting data they can pull from a server with some computer clicks makes no fucking sense. Why are you asserting something like this without verification?

AM I THE ONLY SANE PERSON IN THIS GODFORSAKEN WORLD??????

You've regressed a little of late, but you have a long way to go either way.

you nerds kept going on and on about chrome so i downloaded it and it sucks bro
i only keep using it so i dont lose street cred

It's nothing like it used to be.

I don't fucking like it how they use Apple's and Windows Certificates. If Firefox can use their own, why are Google using the operating system's?

So many creepy unknowns that are commercial-in-confidence. Which is another way of saying "we're fucking you and we don't want you to know about it". The competitors are all in cahoots with each other. It's so insulting.

INTEL invents(?) SDDs and suddenly every competitor in the world is selling SDDs? How does this make sense? Aren't these secrets 'proprietary'? Vomit.

Just an hour ago I ran this by my mother, she replies "Oh yeah, I heard...something about that. That facebook is doing something weird"

I explain what exactly is going on, her response "oh well, i don't log in to facebook from my phone, I'm not worried about it"

The fuck? How can someone miss the damned point by so much? Anyone with common sense would read the article Scuter posted and want NOTHING to do with facebook for the rest of his or her life.

She's not worried about it. You're yet to even explain why you left Facebook in October, which allows me to know you left for a different, unrelated reason altogether and you're using this as validation of your decision or something retarded like that. Because I have a mind, I can understand these things. You should stop with all this nonsense.

You probably had no reason to leave Facebook. You're not exactly someone the creeps have a lot of value in keeping tabs on. You're kind of representative of their engine room, or at least, you always have been.

Produce something that verifies your concerns otherwise your raving lunacy gets embarrassing for legitimately concerned individuals, who are censored by Facebook and locked out of their account for weeks on end being told they forgot the password they've entered 1000 times successfully and something's wrong with the SMS system, all the password SMSs lost in the towers or something. Google was sending me SMSs just fine, I pointed out to Facebook before simultaneously realising I could backdoor my way in with my Gmail password (functionality I think they've closed up since).

Produce verification. Or shut the hell up with your lunacy.

http://i.imgur.com/7tHnA.png

Here's an exercise for you: Can you spot the narcissist?

http://i.imgur.com/yqgWW.png

[Statutory Ape]

I left facebook specifically because #1 they claim all rights to any media uploaded to their site #2 they acknowledge allowing the military to operate robots/computer programs that pretend to be people you know

I find both creepy in the fullest. Let's add the final salt to my facebook wound- it seems to kill actual human communication.

I am sorry but chatting on facebook is pathetic and should never take the place of real actual communication- yet it does, all the time, for lots and lots of people. It is slowly eroding human communication, and I fucking hate it.

Scuter you are not always right nor can you always "see the unseen" ok? Lighten up.

Oh and I forgot the rampant malware one can easily find on that site. UGH

[Statutory Ape]

since scuter will accuse me of being a liar, without actually googling anything himself

http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2011/02/18/revealed-air-force-ordered-software-to-manage-army-of-fake-virtual-people/


Revealed: Air Force ordered software to manage army of fake virtual people

These days, with Facebook and Twitter and social media galore, it can be increasingly hard to tell who your “friends” are.

But after this, Internet users would be well advised to ask another question entirely: Are my “friends” even real people?


In the continuing saga of data security firm HBGary, a new caveat has come to light: not only did they plot to help destroy secrets outlet WikiLeaks and discredit progressive bloggers, they also crafted detailed proposals for software that manages online “personas,” allowing a single human to assume the identities of as many fake people as they’d like.

The revelation was among those contained in the company’s emails, which were dumped onto bittorrent networks after hackers with cyber protest group “Anonymous” broke into their systems.

In another document unearthed by “Anonymous,” one of HBGary’s employees also mentioned gaming geolocation services to make it appear as though selected fake persons were at actual events.

“There are a variety of social media tricks we can use to add a level of realness to all fictitious personas,” it said.

Government involvement

Eerie as that may be, more perplexing, however, is a federal contract (PDF) from the 6th Contracting Squadron at MacDill Air Force Base, located south of Tampa, Florida, that solicits providers of “persona management software.”

Update: The contract has since been taken off FBO.gov. The link above has been updated.

While there are certainly legitimate applications for such software, such as managing multiple “official” social media accounts from a single input, the more nefarious potential is clear.

Unfortunately, the Air Force’s contract description doesn’t help dispel suspicions. As the text explains, the software would require licenses for 50 users with 10 personas each, for a total of 500. These personas would have to

be “replete with background , history, supporting details, and cyber presences that are technically, culturally and geographacilly consistent.”

It continues, noting the need for secure virtual private networks that randomize the operator’s Internet protocol (IP) address, making it impossible to detect that it’s a single person orchestrating all these posts. Another entry calls for static IP address management for each persona, making it appear as though each fake person was consistently accessing from the same computer each time.

The contract also sought methods to anonymously establish virtual private servers with private hosting firms in specific geographic locations. This would allow that server’s “geosite” to be integrated with their social media profiles, effectively gaming geolocation services.

The Air Force added that the “place of performance” for the contract would be at MacDill Air Force Base, along with Kabul, Afghanistan and Baghdad. The contract was offered on June 22, 2010.

It was not clear exactly what the Air Force was doing with this software, or even if it had been procured.

Manufacturing consent

Though many questions remain about how the military would apply such technology, the reasonable fear should be perfectly clear. “Persona management software” can be used to manipulate public opinion on key information, such as news reports. An unlimited number of virtual “people” could be marshaled by only a few real individuals, empowering them to create the illusion of consensus.

You could call it a virtual flash mob, or a digital “Brooks Brothers Riot,” so to speak: compelling, but not nearly as spontaneous as it appears.

That’s precisely what got DailyKos blogger Happy Rockefeller in a snit: the potential for military-run armies of fake people manipulating and, in some cases, even manufacturing the appearance of public opinion.

“I don’t know about you, but it matters to me what fellow progressives think,” the blogger wrote. “I consider all views. And if there appears to be a consensus that some reporter isn’t credible, for example, or some candidate for congress in another state can’t be trusted, I won’t base my entire judgment on it, but it carries some weight.

“That’s me. I believe there are many people though who will base their judgment on rumors and mob attacks. And for those people, a fake mob can be really effective.”

It was Rockefeller who was first to highlight the Air Force’s “persona” contract, which was available on a public website.

A call to MacDill Air Force Base, requesting an explanation of the contract and what this software might be used for, was answered by a public affairs officer who promised a call-back. No reply was received at time of this story’s publication.

Other e-mails circulated by HBGary’s CEO illuminate highly personal data about critics of the US Chamber of Commerce, including detailed information about their spouses and children, as well as their locations and professional links. The firm, it was revealed, was just one part of a group called “Team Themis,” tasked by the Chamber to come up with strategies for responding to progressive bloggers and others.

“Team Themis” also included a proposal to use malware hacks against progressive organizations, and the submission of fake documents in an effort to discredit established groups.

HBGary was also behind a plot by Bank of America to destroy WikiLeaks’ technology platform, other emails revealed. The company was humiliated by members of “Anonymous” after CEO Aaron Barr bragged that he’d “infiltrated” the group.

A request for comment emailed to HBGary did not receive a reply.

Update: HBGary Federal among bidders

A list of interested vendors responding to the Air Force contract for “persona management software” included HBGary subsideary HBGary Federal, further analysis of a government website has revealed.

Other companies that offered their services included Global Business Solutions and Associates LLC, Uk Plus Logistics, Ltd., NevinTelecom, Bunker Communications and Planmatrix LLC.

[Statutory Ape]

The only word I can think of when I hear the word facebook is EVIL

[DankBlaniels]

mike have you ever considered that everyone here is a bot and that none of this is real ?

[poofter]

the kid jewed the idea of facebook

[nextlevelshit]

THe government having sock puppets isn't even really a facebook issue. They can do that all over the web and I'm sure they have. Astroturfing/sock puppets/whatever you call it, it is not a symptom of facebook.

Yesterday I just got a question asking if a friend of mine was a real person. LOL. Apparently facebook is trying to attack the issue of sock puppets.

Really the problem with facebook is all the data they acquire and the fact that when you delete it they still retain it. That should be a privacy concern. If you use facebook in a reasonable way just to keep track of acquaintances then there is little info given out except who your circle of friends is.

[gay sex]

hey catfish? greaaaaaaaaaat story

[nextlevelshit]

Nuthairs. Yea I got em.

And whiskers.

Your life sucks in comparison.

Get in life son.

[SkyNigger]

Your demented narcissism is out of control.

The clincher for me was when I read the air force had a small army of fake people who are bots that go around befriending people and acting/speaking like they are from whatever area they claim and try to network around, collecting information on everyone they come in contact with.

You fucking moron. The articles are fascinating and discuss "opinion-skewing flashmobs", which is a brilliant but evil application of technology.

You fucking moron and your demented narcissism. This is why you need to post links you fucking imbecile. The concerns have nothing to do with privacy, which make absolutely zero sense whatsoever because they have all the 'private' information already and your unfathomable obsession with keeping your lurid 'secrets' hidden from Big Brother (who gives you all the diaries with locks to help you be secure) just overrode everything written by the writers of the articles and the comments. You focused on a tiny paragraph that mentioned privacy concerns for critics of US Department of Commerce, with their information circulated by HBGary emails.

You miss the entire FUCKING POINT of everything. It's a real problem you have, with that demented narcissism.

I get laughed at by my friends for even mentioning it, like how could I be upset, what do I have to hide?

You moron Toddler. You're too ridiculous to parody.

The fuck is wrong with people? It's not about whether you are a bad person or not, it's about YOUR FUCKING PRIVACY and not being ok with the government trampling all over our damned rights by doing CREEPY CREEPY SHIT. SHIT LIKE HAVING AN ARMY OF FAKE HUMAN BEINGS ON FACEBOOK COLLECTING DATA

You imbecile. It's got literally nothing to do with "privacy". It's got everything to do with swaying public opinion in high-value discussions where, in the past, a single intelligent poster could post logic and thousands or tens of thousands of people would see the light. Now, the discussion just gets derailed by the noise of screaming imbeciles.

When imbeciles scream, all you can hear is screaming. The logic is drowned out BY TODDLERS LIKE YOU.

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2011/02/16/945768/-UPDATED-The-HB-Gary-Email-That-Should-Concern-Us-All

It goes far beyond the mere ability for a government stooge, corporation or PR firm to hire people to post on sites like this one. They are talking about creating the illusion of consensus. And consensus is a powerful persuader. What has more effect, one guy saying BP is not at fault? Or 20 people saying it? For the weak minded, the number can make all the difference.

And another thing, this is just one little company of assholes. I can't believe there aren't others doing this already. From oil companies, political campaigns, PR firms, you name it. Public opinion means big bucks. And let's face it, what these guys are talking about is easy.

Yes, it's fucking easy. This is a genuine issue of immense validity. And you, you fucking muppet, demented in your horrifying but hilarious narcissism, missed literally everything about the issue and honed in the only thing you're concerned about; the government knowing your dumb - junkie - lurid - fucking - shit.

They know all about your shit, dude. They know everyone's shit. Wake the fuck up. If they wanted to arrest pedophiles, you know they could like just go down and install evidence-recording systems in the Confessional boxes across the country. Or they could just come and arrest all the guys on their database.

But that is not intelligent POWER-building. Intelligent power-building is to "let it be". Then, when one of the people you're "letting be" decides to pop up with some hassles for you, zap. Hassles gone.

AM I THE ONLY SANE PERSON IN THIS GODFORSAKEN WORLD??????

Definitely. If only there were more like you.

Changing the emails in your account is fucked up but makes perfect commercial sense.

An army of fake? (what does that mean?) human beings (is there such a thing) on Facebook collecting data they can pull from a server with some computer clicks makes no fucking sense. Why are you asserting something like this without verification?

I think it's obvious why. Isn't it? Jesus fucking Christ, you're unbelievable.

Produce verification. Or shut the hell up with your lunacy.

I couldn't have imagined you were TWICE the lunatic. This is why you post verification, so that people don't have to be LIED to by your fucking misrepresentation and LIES.

since scuter will accuse me of being a liar, without actually googling anything himself

You moron. Why the fuck would I Google something that was obviously false (your filthy LYING claims about privacy)?

You're too stupid to be alive. You're not functional. You're just not serviceable.

http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2011/02/18/revealed-air-force-ordered-software-to-manage-army-of-fake-virtual-people/

Though many questions remain about how the military would apply such technology, the reasonable fear should be perfectly clear. “Persona management software” can be used to manipulate public opinion on key information, such as news reports. An unlimited number of virtual “people” could be marshaled by only a few real individuals, empowering them to create the illusion of consensus.

You could call it a virtual flash mob, or a digital “Brooks Brothers Riot,” so to speak: compelling, but not nearly as spontaneous as it appears.

That’s precisely what got DailyKos blogger Happy Rockefeller in a snit: the potential for military-run armies of fake people manipulating and, in some cases, even manufacturing the appearance of public opinion.

“I don’t know about you, but it matters to me what fellow progressives think,” the blogger wrote. “I consider all views. And if there appears to be a consensus that some reporter isn’t credible, for example, or some candidate for congress in another state can’t be trusted, I won’t base my entire judgment on it, but it carries some weight.

“That’s me. I believe there are many people though who will base their judgment on rumors and mob attacks. And for those people, a fake mob can be really effective.”

It was Rockefeller who was first to highlight the Air Force’s “persona” contract, which was available on a public website.

A call to MacDill Air Force Base, requesting an explanation of the contract and what this software might be used for, was answered by a public affairs officer who promised a call-back. No reply was received at time of this story’s publication.

Other e-mails circulated by HBGary’s CEO illuminate highly personal data about critics of the US Chamber of Commerce, including detailed information about their spouses and children, as well as their locations and professional links.

In blue, you have the issue.

In red, is what Mike the Narcissist misrepresented the issue as being.

You.fucking.imbecile. You stupid Toddler.

[SkyNigger]

Anonymous posted HBGary’s emails in a searchable format, and the ensuing press scrum exposed a darker side to HBGary Federal’s business that offered a variety of dirty tricks to its clients. In a proposal intended for Bank of America and written on behalf of a law firm referred to the bank by the U.S. Department of Justice, Barr suggested borderline illegal tactics that aimed at responding to a potential release of the bank’s documents by WikiLeaks. Those methods included cyberattacks, misinformation, forged documents, pressuring donors and even blackmailing WikiLeaks supporters

It's never the press finding anything out.

And the only time I've ever had a scandal to refer to the press, no response beyond a little wordplay with the legislation without notice to that effect. That's Law for you.

The illusions people have with illusionary constructs is out of control.

I prefer what is tangible.

http://a7.sphotos.ak.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ak-ash3/562877_388837531177476_1890511849_n.jpg

I don't think there's ever been any truly "consensual sex" but as long as I'm not doing the raping and no one suffers to please...probably as ethical as it gets, I imagine.

[SkyNigger]

In a proposal intended for Bank of America and written on behalf of a law firm referred to the bank by the U.S. Department of Justice, Barr suggested borderline illegal tactics that aimed at responding to a potential release of the bank’s documents by WikiLeaks. Those methods included cyberattacks, misinformation, forged documents, pressuring donors and even blackmailing WikiLeaks supporters

Those who think the government is their friend or who pretend to think that (you never know with Confidence Tricking Toddlers) are only borderline delusional. Insanity is on the other side of the border. Evil encroaches onto most of the peninsula.

Once you start playing denialist games with yourself imagining that you're being crafty by overlooking the truth, there's no mapped path back to Sanity.

"The government is not your friend."

"But what they did was only borderline illegal, in this instance."

Toddlers suck at motive so badly it's hilarious.

"Power played by power's own rules, even though it was borderline."

Toddlers and 'their'rules. They think Power writes rules to protect them, or loopholes to be used by them to legally exploit. Fools.

http://a6.sphotos.ak.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ak-ash3/548638_416542901722469_728452117_n.jpg

[poofter]

Are there still communists these days?


http://oi45.tinypic.com/27yv6ys.jpg

heres a true hottie

[SkyNigger]

Comments

Reppat:
body is hecka tangible, but nose is so oblong my geometry teacher would blush

The Christian exploitation of these girls for their 'ugly' noses and not-white-enough skin is sickening. My former best friend Peung (who I lost to Christianity, she's all awkward and considerate of my feelings so that she doesn't offend my insanity now) is dropping like a rock. Next Christian development, her nose is suddenly no good (was perfectly fine obv) and she needs a nose like this oblong one because every girl is getting one. Next Christian development...

http://f.cl.ly/items/1Z0F2t3U0O090c3k1i3v/2012-07-09%2008.57.27.jpg

She'd never once done that before.

Onward Christian soldiers. Ripping their way through Thailand. GG.

What about this one ya poof?

http://desmond.imageshack.us/Himg819/scaled.php?server=819&filename=omgjb.jpg&res=landing

oldie but a goodie.

[DankBlaniels]

KIDS GOT TO GET HIS DVDS YALL

[DankBlaniels]

I NOSE WHAT THATS ALL ABOUT