View Full Version : Premium Poker Content
Hillbilly Jim
01-23-2010, 11:19 PM
i dont know why anyone would play anything other than rush poker
regular poker is for old guys with heart conditions and low self esteem
rush poker is for alpha males
http://www.averdata.net/~locbaseb/funny/35_5.jpg
Hillbilly Jim
01-24-2010, 03:32 AM
alpha male shit right here dawgs
Dealer: Hand #17856584334
Dealer: Neil Tome has 8 seconds left to act
Dealer: scsmith986 shows four of a kind, Nines
Dealer: Dr Sam Beckett shows a straight flush, Jack high
Dealer: Dr Sam Beckett wins the pot ($18.05) with a straight flush, Jack high
SkyNigger
01-24-2010, 07:41 AM
Rush and Stars' answer to Rush will change online poker forever.
anatine
01-24-2010, 07:57 AM
My answer to online poker will change rush and Star's answer to rush forever.
Hillbilly Jim
01-24-2010, 10:20 AM
let the record show that that fella flopped quads to my open ended straight flush draw and i got it on th river sfo
then after droppind fow stakes,had to getout of the noslbee, some nmbnuts beat my steal wheel with a fuck 6 hugh straight flush his faggoy ass got on the river
SkyNigger
01-24-2010, 05:57 PM
There is hella widespread talk [from sources not known to be susceptible to 'conspiracy theories' or 'scandal' or even 'cynicism'] that there appears to be an inordinately ridiculous amount of Wow hands being made on their tables.
These are people who've played 2 million or w/e online hands at FTP and elsewhere. Not exactly hysterical types.
Personally, I have zero problem with RNGs designed to create 'action' or 'setup' hands - so long as the RNG doesn't favour particular players, I'll adjust. But is it intriguing all the same...imo. Which is > your opinion.
Cliffnotes: I'm looking forward to hitting some hella big hands when they [eventually] bring in MSNL.
blake
01-24-2010, 06:00 PM
There is hella widespread talk [from sources not known to be susceptible to 'conspiracy theories' or 'scandal' or even 'cynicism'] that there appears to be an inordinately ridiculous amount of Wow hands being made on their tables.
These are people who've played 2 million or w/e online hands at FTP and elsewhere. Not exactly hysterical types.
Personally, I have zero problem with RNGs designed to create 'action' or 'setup' hands - so long as the RNG doesn't favour particular players, I'll adjust. But is it intriguing all the same...imo. Which is > your opinion.
Cliffnotes: I'm looking forward to hitting some hella big hands when they [eventually] bring in MSNL.
This has completely been my experience as well. Literally 100% of the time I have an overpair, the other guy has a set. Or vice-versa. But it is one or the other.
mama luigi
01-24-2010, 06:10 PM
thats poker folks
vBulletin® v3.8.4, Copyright ©2000-2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.