Founding Mothers. 1.2 - Moderation.

[scuter]

I think 3 options here:

1. Uncensored. And shit.

- actual uncensored for anything and everything not super criminal like pedophilia and breaching immigration laws.

White Collar or other victimless crime like jailbait porn, race-based discrimination, prostitution services, and Contract Hits under $2500 I'm thinking are fine but we'd need to run it past SkatzLegal maybe.

2. [B]Uncensored. But exception made for Terrible to be banned.

Perhaps only if the people demand thus. Or maybe mods do what they do, and if they fuck something up, the people go to the polls to reverse the Terrible?

3. We Make Our Choices. Then Suffer With Them. [for max term limits]

Mods elected into position or otherwise holding their various levels of BeanPower do whatever they want. If the people dislike it, they can make their voice heard at the next General Election. So we could suffer under a Dubya or something which could create some drama - but the good kind like attacking another forum or something. Not the hopeless, unfunny kind that can't be reversed cause Ion is having too much fun rubbing his bean.

[I will die before anyone can convince me he wrote that rating thread of his. He hired someone to not be terrible for extended period of time surely.]

But if we did accidentally vote in NiggerStop, we could then maybe get even a Black Admin after the carnage was over.

I think that would be nice.

http://moniquemonicat.files.wordpress.com/2009/05/obama-messiah.jpg

West Wing did a pretty good job with their Latino candidate in Season 8 [pretty sure he only won in the show due to Helen Santos - I don't care who you are, neverstop, beenstaring, chuckwoolery....if this is your wife, I think you win]:

http://www.joblo.com/newsimages1/teri-polo1.jpg

But I don't think we're ready for a Latino Prez sorry USC [you'd get my vote if we were - obv].

------

Thoughts on moderation? Anyone care?

* What I'm hoping will happen is that someone who shares my love of Serious. Business - maybe someone with a law degree, or had recently passed the Bar - helps write a Constitution of some kind.

But if no one cares, I'll just make up god rules I guess.

But please care.

[scuter]

hofas

[Steerpike]

hall of fame and such?

[Steerpike]

'Thanks for adding reputation to this user. May you be lucky enough to receive the same Reputation back in turn.'

:hofas

[scuter]

We really need to fix this Repas Situationas.

Fuck where is a bearded man when you need him.

:ballin

[VaughnP]

Hall of fame and such is perhaps only describable as hall of fame and such.

Hofa immediately reminds me of an awfully comfortable sofa, sort of like the one I sit on when not in my recliner watching football on the weekends. I can now say an HOFly comfortable HOFa and it will make perfect sense.

I guess I thought that all along.

[MistaCobalina]

How about we just have a Hova?

[scuter]

dilly the dillas in the house.

[henrybulldog]

is the rep sysytem necessary? really is it??

[VaughnP]

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/9/95/Oh_Henry_bar.jpg/800px-Oh_Henry_bar.jpg

[gay sex]

this guy deserves to be banned for spelling errorrs

[Steerpike]

this guy deserves to be banned for spelling errorrs

actually it's errrorrrs

yay New Orleans!!!

[gay sex]

meta john, meta

[Steerpike]

USC can you translate?

[USC]

no habla translation

[gay sex]

lol that nigga failed spanish 1 at el camino college

[VaughnP]

meta john, meta


Pierre Thomas's teammate john, a kicker who doesn't score field goals?

[Steerpike]

they are called punters right?

[gay sex]

if i had a dollar id bet you

[VaughnP]

A punter punts, Mr. Pike.

[gay sex]

you guys get that sonic fast food commercial reference right

[VaughnP]

Didn't see it.

[Steerpike]

is that harry connick jr in those other awful ads?

[gay sex]

he was great in that serial killer movie

[scuter]

Harry Connick Jr. is great in every movie.

[gay sex]

copycat daaaaaawg

[henrybulldog]

vaughn are those choccy bars any good? how much for you to mail me a few??

[Hillbilly Jim]

1. what are you talkign about his rating thread was terrible. so much ball gagging i threw up myself and had no balls in my mouth
2. teri polo nude is a good thing for this foram

[SkyNigger]

I have the solution.

Return to the Constitution.

http://favim.com/orig/201107/31/asian-asian-girl-beautiful-beauty-cute-Favim.com-118249.jpg

I think 3 options here:

1. Uncensored. And shit.

- actual uncensored for anything and everything not super criminal like pedophilia and breaching immigration laws.

White Collar or other victimless crime like jailbait porn, race-based discrimination, prostitution services, and Contract Hits under $2500 I'm thinking are fine but we'd need to run it past SkatzLegal maybe.

2. [B]Uncensored. But exception made for Terrible to be banned.

Perhaps only if the people demand thus. Or maybe mods do what they do, and if they fuck something up, the people go to the polls to reverse the Terrible?

3. We Make Our Choices. Then Suffer With Them. [for max term limits]

Mods elected into position or otherwise holding their various levels of BeanPower do whatever they want. If the people dislike it, they can make their voice heard at the next General Election. So we could suffer under a Dubya or something which could create some drama - but the good kind like attacking another forum or something. Not the hopeless, unfunny kind that can't be reversed cause Ion is having too much fun rubbing his bean.

[I will die before anyone can convince me he wrote that rating thread of his. He hired someone to not be terrible for extended period of time surely.]

But if we did accidentally vote in NiggerStop, we could then maybe get even a Black Admin after the carnage was over.

I think that would be nice.

But I don't think we're ready for a Latino Prez sorry USC [you'd get my vote if we were - obv].

------

Thoughts on moderation? Anyone care?

* What I'm hoping will happen is that someone who shares my love of Serious. Business - maybe someone with a law degree, or had recently passed the Bar - helps write a Constitution of some kind.

But if no one cares, I'll just make up god rules I guess.

But please care.

[SkyNigger]

1 is eliminated. I was wrong about Humanity and the sociopaths who get high on screaming lies and stalking.

[VaughnP]

How can you make a case for 2 being eliminated then? No one wants anyone besides Mike banned, Jewdonk is a tossup.

[SkyNigger]

How can you make a case for 2 being eliminated then? No one wants anyone besides Mike banned, Jewdonk is a tossup.

Not the hopeless, unfunny kind that can't be reversed cause Ion is having too much fun rubbing his bean.


I haven't really spent much at all so I don't care about ownership - I'll take 0% if I was convinced we'd never have to worry about Boreus nonsense again from Little Hitlerr.


Jewdonk and Mike are banned because if you want them here, you can have them but you'll all literally be the filthiest whores alive. You all seem to think I act hastily just because you act hastily.

There is a lot of Jewdonk filth on this site and no content.

You want insane screaming then reconcile with how you banned an autoplay HoF poster.

The latter you can solve your Self on www.google.com - the former creates PFA threads which are fucking horrifying insanity and way past the line of anything remotely discuss-able.

The primary problem of this issue has been the incapacity of narcissists to act with decency. I alone can hold my head up high. Where is the transparency.

I'm taking back my site and giving out %'s (equal) to any verified identities. No one else can lay claim to the right to smear filthy lies and duck back into their anonymity without providing a single shred of verification to support what really is outrageous filth.

I'm the only one with the history of ethics and transparency and none of you have any. Give me my site back, I'm starting from scratch.

[VaughnP]

That was already done along time ago. Every person that was originally in the IST when the site started and remained active on the site has an equal share and say in the content with the simple rules being no bans unless the person is spamming, intentionally trying to harm the site, or posting illegal shit. There are extreme cases where if banning the person to better their lives is necessary, then it shall be done a la 408. The only other rule is that nothing gets deleted that isn't going to harm someone's personal life. Every new poster also has a chance to work their way into a share and say by posting and not being a moronic toddler faggot.

You are fucking up the banning rule. You have transformed the "banning monsters" agreement into a system of punishment that is solely at your discretion.

Seriously, there needs to be nothing else besides this in place. It is just common sense, and it's what virtually everyone here but you wants. There literally would be no disputes besides standard flaming if these two rules are followed.

Think about it. Bans and content deletion are the only things that have caused serious fighting amongst us - therefore they are eliminated without a democratic process first.

[VaughnP]

This shit is all really gay, can't we just get back to the absurdity and food trip reports?

[VaughnP]

Can you honestly not see the Ianesque essence of your banning ways, Scooter? It's literally the site against you, and you have quite a few of the smartest of smart people disagreeing with you, vehemently so because we have all witnessed this before with Ian and Micon. What you are doing is taking the site and making it entirely about you and not about the users. Even if you were 100% right, and in this case none of us think you are, literally everyone else overrules you. It's just the way shit works, man.

[tire]

i was never banned for what its worth.

whats stopping you from doing all this yourself scooter?

[tire]

the reeducation camp idea is far better than banning 70% of your core userbase

[VaughnP]

i was never banned for what its worth.

whats stopping you from doing all this yourself scooter?

The people as a whole owning Skatz.

[SkyNigger]

That was already done along time ago. Every person that was originally in the IST when the site started and remained active on the site has an equal share and say in the content with the simple rules being no bans unless the person is spamming, intentionally trying to harm the site, or posting illegal shit. There are extreme cases where if banning the person to better their lives is necessary, then it shall be done a la 408. The only other rule is that nothing gets deleted that isn't going to harm someone's personal life. Every new poster also has a chance to work their way into a share and say by posting and not being a moronic toddler faggot.

You are fucking up the banning rule. You have transformed the "banning monsters" agreement into a system of punishment that is solely at your discretion.

Seriously, there needs to be nothing else besides this in place. It is just common sense, and it's what virtually everyone here but you wants. There literally would be no disputes besides standard flaming if these two rules are followed.

Think about it. Bans and content deletion are the only things that have caused serious fighting amongst us - therefore they are eliminated without a democratic process first.

http://i.imgur.com/YkJ1F.png

I already know you're a filthy liar. Give me back my site.

[SkyNigger]

This shit is all really gay, can't we just get back to the absurdity and food trip reports?

http://i.imgur.com/YkJ1F.png

That is why I need the site back from liars.

I know you're a filthy liar. Now give me back my site.

[SkyNigger]

Can you honestly not see the Ianesque essence of your banning ways, Scooter? It's literally the site against you, and you have quite a few of the smartest of smart people disagreeing with you, vehemently so because we have all witnessed this before with Ian and Micon. What you are doing is taking the site and making it entirely about you and not about the users. Even if you were 100% right, and in this case none of us think you are, literally everyone else overrules you. It's just the way shit works, man.

You're a filthy liar. GIVE ME BACK MY SITE.

http://i.imgur.com/YkJ1F.png

[tire]

would you like to be guest toddler of honor in the first week of the new program?

[tire]

NPuA2quE2_4&autoplay=1

[SkyNigger]

You don't own Skatz Vaughn. You have no ethics so you are not to be trusted with it.

You lie. Return the site you stole Vaughn.

http://i.imgur.com/ZuzWr.png

[SkyNigger]

Vaughn: The people own Skatz.

No. The People owned Skatz when I controlled my site. As I never banned anyone, your lying in order to steal it could not have been for the People.

Your refusal to return it even though you've been shown to have lied through your filthy teeth, is not to hold onto it for The People, you stole it to be Little Napoleon.

Return the site to The People Vaughn. Your ethics has been revealed as non-existent. You're corrupted and you cannot steal a site under false promises and then fail to live up to a single term.

http://i.imgur.com/ZuzWr.png

[tire]

jesus christ. i am now retired

[tire]

_iz4--pOAkQ