And this is them admitting it's nothing:

What part of her getting the same amount of votes as Obama and evidence showing that even Obama would have lost do you not understand?

By your logic, Kasich was incredibly likeable therefore he beats Trump. Right? Likability doesn't always equal more or less votes.

the only source of this info is manfort's lawyers' botching of a redacted filing. the filing doesn't indicate the exact date of the sharing of polling data with the russian.

your question doesn't make a lot of sense though. like manafort went rogue and gave polling data when he wasn't connected to the campaign anymore? (of course, how would he have gotten it?)

it might help though to not be the 2nd least likable candidate of all time though, no?

how is that your takeaway?

you are honestly a stupid, stupid person.

if i had super admin, vaughn would cease to exist on skatz

the new york times saying they can't say what manafort's motivation was for giving the polling data = "it must have been nothing."

VaughnP ladies and gentlemen

jim, bob and gare can we just start a ninth tier poker forum please

Now hang on there just a second Timmy, I'm not a political person like either of you. They're all terrible. Also, you saying Hillary was the 2nd most unliked candidate is absolutely ridiculous. I'm not gonna look it up, but Mondale won 1 state. So if you're telling me she's on par with that, I'm just gonna have to call bullshit.