Not really sure how I'm expected to continue reading past this:
The fact that I noticed the "highly cited", bit my tongue, and continued regardless will require some therapy - I suspect - to come to terms with.
I mustn't be so hard on myself, but that was a sloppy effort.
The psychiatric industry is very much hampered by a long, proud history of Toddlers too stupid and vile to live, demanding and getting 'respect' from Toddlers. The idea that any study must be deferential to previous insanity flies against every academic tenet worth a damn.
What humans do is whatever those who destroy their minds and continually play patron>vassal imprinting games with their minds via the media's FEAR campaigns for life...tell them via the media to do.
Everyone is insane except for me and a couple others. I've proven this beyond logical refute too often to continually pretend that Toddlers who aren't willing to refute the logic, aren't willing to accept the logical proofs, aren't willing to do anything except hold onto their faith and their Confidence Tricks...are worth hanging around for.
Her name was Nasa. Yes, like the Space Program. Amazingly, missed by me when she hit on me at Funky the night before and gave me her number. The next day, I made lots of tight jokes, some lame ones, zero of them registered. Her English wasn't great but she was fucking hot.
Empty feeling though. She wasn't Thai. She was Taiwanese.
This is her ass taken by me looking out over my balcony at Lebua @ State Tower (tight hotel).
I read at 700wpm with >95% comprehension retained. Have you ever seen me feign illiteracy to pretend I didn't read a post?
If these were supposed to be counter-arguments, you may have been misinformed by someone - somewhere - at some point. One figures.
Maybe all points.
You're claiming that your body requires you to do something you claim shames you or blah blah it's all bullshit. Either you do it and you take ownership of your actions without shame at your conducting them or you don't it.
Simple. This bullshit
I want to eat my fatalistic excuses and keep my self-defeating shame too, is dumb. Beneath any conversation I am going to be in. And an insulting lie that will never allow your reacquisition of the Self they robbed you of in order to use you as a human disposal marble.
I wasn't sure how I regained my Self, and I'm still not sure but it's possible I got my Self-respect back by slamming Lies in the faces of sleazy creeps all over the internet. I don't know if it has value but then I wasn't doing these things for that reason. I've been doing this a long time now on YouTube & commenting on articles and every time I see lies and brazen creepy sleaze I try and ridicule it with Truth. I was doing this all for me because I was sick.to.death. of shivering at the insanity of fucking creeps that every tenet of the creepiest world imaginable literally produces.
Somewhere, perhaps related perhaps not, I got my sense of Self back. It's a prerequisite to making a claim for sanity.
It's not hard to do. It doesn't take long. What I want to know is "Why do I literally never see this sort of thing anywhere? I do it. But why? The think the answer is that you're all filthy but I'm willing to listen to defence arguments for justifying why you walk past sleaze and lies every day without getting audible.
It's a scam product so I'm not going to get emotional about getting their branding right. But yes, whatever they brand themselves as is what I meant but didn't believe was valuable enough to Google for accuracy.
Show me where you have made a logical argument. Feel free to highlight the logical argument. If the argument is to be found in that link, whoops. You have failed to make a logical argument for my clicking on it. Actually, you've made a pretty good logical argument for my NOT insulting myself with the idiotic propaganda written by imbeciles too stupid to distinguish
medicine from
substitute medicine of unknown chemical properties.
It's such an easy mistake to make.
This is your summary argument in conclusion of a rebuttal that contains exactly zero (0) rebuttal arguments.
This is not logical nor is it in your best interests. You should endeavour less to hold onto what you know and endeavour to try to learn the correct information (for a change).
Or counter with the correct information if I have erred in logic or w/e.
Nothing in the above even makes sense. It's a disgrace. What is this? Don't answer that question. Just learn.
What is this nonsense. You think this is how you make an argument?
You're going to need less FAITH in your moronic set-belief-system and in your memories which have all be referenced from an incorrect starting point and are patently corrupted. You need to have less trust in the psychological cognitive decision-making capacities of mice when degrading yourself and degrading anyone that reads your attempts to draw links to obscure dreams? (these are lab environments in your mind, without anything to assess their existence? WHY AM I EVEN BEING DEGRADED LIKE THIS. WHY AM I BEING FORCED TO POINT OUT TO YOU THAT YOU HAVE NOT MADE AN ARGUMENT IN ONE POST AND HAVE NO LINKS AND JUST RAMBLING ABOUT MICE IN YOUR SECOND?
This is degrading. Stop looking for reasons to believe what you idiotically want to believe. You want Self. You don't want to be their slave.
What the fuck are you talking about.
Don't explain the insanity above. I'm telling you that you need to have a clue about what you're talking about because...THIS...whatever this is, this is something I'm never going to be happy about doing ever again.
Where does the research lab in your mind find its cocaine for the tests with mice that are somehow linked to your mind or....pass.
You are asking me to feel empathy for a lab mouse that you have identified with. Jesus. Christ. Too much emotion for this little mouse you imagine is you.
Here's a much better idea for what you could do.
Don't do the above.
Rummage all you like or don't rummage. But don't ever present an argument that makes me want to be disgusted. Because I don't FEELING that way. Don't make me FEEL disgusted with your idea of a counter-argument.
Maybe dial up the rummaging by a factor of 20 ? Make an argument in support of your position or a counter-argument against mine. This....I don't do this. Whatever rummaging means. I'm assuming it means you tried and couldn't find it.
So for all I know you just imagined it, just like the emotions you imagine in your imagination which are not real but are merely imagined. You understand?
I think you are mental.
I think the mental power of your brain to drive your body is so far outside your capacity to fathom, that you get convinced about things you want to believe the instant creeps convince you that it's all a foregone conclusion. It's a bit like pedophiles who believe they are biological pedophiles. how is that possible.
Answer: No one knows shit.
But what you know, need to be disposed of and you need to start fresh.
Is this your idea of an argument for getting me to read an article on genetic predisposition to addiction? Why would I find it interesting?
$100,000 says I can get whatever joke scientist was PAID to come up with that link between HEREDITARY failure to come up with all kinds of ludicrous arguments. Stop reading what the poison-sellers want you to believe.
What human beings know about the human brain is so horrifying it would be better if everyone stopped pretending they had a clue and started from scratch. The scientific community has been corrupted by greed, nothing you're going to read is paid for by DECENCY.
MONEY MONEY MONEY. Science isn't supposed to work that way.
I'm not going to click on your moronic links until you learn how to make an argument better than "you might find this interesting".
Threaded Mode
