The vices are not the problem. The poisons kill but they are not the problem. Aside from the tame physiological withdrawal symptoms, no one is addicted to alcohol. They're addicted to pain relief.
Remove the need for the relief, and you'll have 'cured' the alcoholic. But until you negate the reason why a human being is seeking pain relief, he will she will never be 'cured'. All your efforts to target their dependancy on a substance will be in vain.
I have reason to believe that when you no longer have USE for those you lie to (for their sake) , you can change their lives with Truth.
You about summed it up perfectly right ^^^
That is my premise- that if the need for pain relief is removed, so is the need to drink.
I also believe alcoholism can not exist without non-drinkers there to create it. It's like a christian thing- my soul didn't need saving until a christian told me it did. An alcoholic is not one without a "normy" there to point it out to them, makes sense yes?
I'm getting DDoS attacked again. Pretty fucking sick of this filthy creepy shit.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Apes of Wrath
I also believe alcoholism can not exist without non-drinkers there to create it. It's like a christian thing- my soul didn't need saving until a christian told me it did. An alcoholic is not one without a "normy" there to point it out to them, makes sense yes?
Yes, of course it makes sense. The *ism isn't ever anything but the side-effect of the core issue which is, everyone is lied to for malicious exploitation purposes. This whole world is lying thinking it makes sense to Confidence Trick everyone else.
You can say "We all need to stop this insane lying" and they're gonna say "yes, you're 100% right" and then they'll lie to you cause ROFL, sucker.
They're too stupid to realise we wouldn't be in Prisoner's dilemma spots if they had the capacity to be sane. I could remove their prison for them. But they just want to argue, or pretend to agree in order to find 'advantage'.
Quote:
I want to change the world JV, someday I will.
That would be good. Because I'm going to die sick of horror of people who don't want to be RIGHT. They just want what they want. They don't want to JUSTIFY what they want. They just want what they want OKAY!?
They're so stupid. They don't even realise that if you cannot justify why you want something, you don't actually want it; someone tricked you.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Apes of Wrath
You are educated formally in economics yes? I have a theory on something, and I wanted your opinion.
Yes I have a Minor in Economics but the thing about formal education is it's bunk. Especially when it comes to the Humanities. History & Economics are the worst. They're all too stupid to be real; the lecturers are just bounty-hunting scum driving their own mercenary-driven agendas. And because they're not lecturers so much as shills writing spin and trying to simultaneously get tenure, they get really ugly when you fuck with them and put all their shit in jeopardy.
Like if you embarrass them in front of a lecture theatre by catching them in one of their endless lies they get away with asserting because everyone is too 'polite' to call them out on them if they notice; or not capable of calling them out on their lies without appearing confrontational. They'd never seen anyone like me. I'd run circles around them with my filthy sneaky little coy, and then tripped them smack into their lie whilst leaning forward attentively trying to eagerly 'learn'. All very innocently. They'd be staring at me in shock, uncertain whether they'd just been unlucky and could back out or whether they should be furious at having been setup.
I'd be wide-eyed and blinking but I couldn't help myself from giving them just a hint of a smirk. The rage. People take their careers very seriously. No one prepares to have their life of work brought into question in a lecture theatre; especially not a lecture at the ADFA campus of the University of NSW. A couple of historians wished they'd found reason to turn down the invitation, but I had no motive to destroy them so I'd let them get off with a "well yes, I'd love to explain further after the lecture, but we probably should get a roll on" - hah. Explain further.
This is a dumb rant about ADFA I just realise and has little to do with your question but meh. Economics is easy. I'll answer it at the bottom.
I learned nothing at ADFA except from this one lecturer (Dr John Walker) who turned out to be gay, no idea if I've rambled about him but he was a teacher who taught to think rather than taught us what he thought. Everyone else just wanted to imprint us with their agenda; Walker didn't give a fuck about any agenda. He was just there to teach for the sake of the joy of making minds mindful of things they should be aware of. We never even really knew what his positions were on anything because he was such a sneaky contrarian position-taker, he could argue every side of every debate passionately and you'd never know what his personal opinions were. His ethics were...
This is ethics for you:
* Said he preferred Walker or John to Dr Walker, I ignored him out of respect for the doctorate qualification (yup, I was that moronic and rude), he eventually all but ordered me to call him Dr Dr Dr Walker or Walker and I instantly realised how I'd been idiotic. He said "Never respect someone who demands your respect." I knew that already. He said "The same could be said for those who would assert they must be called Your Honour or The Right Honourable (Member of Parliament honorific) because they never have honour." I didn't know that. He said "Respect is almost always desired by those who don't understand it because they've never been given any, so I'd just give them what they want." I thought he was contradicting himself and a number of people started asking the question when I understood, what they want is not respect. They're demanding deference. They don't want the respect that someone gives you when they value you to the point where they will be critical of you. That's probably the greatest compliment there is in this world of everyone ignoring everyone because everyone except a tiny handful are insane. This last one was a very good piece of advice I could have used on a few occasions to avoid unnecessary suffering as a child.
* For two years, he listened to my vocal homophobic rhetoric, hatred & unthinkable contempt as befitting a SE QLD boy without once feeling the need to make it about him and correct me for my offence or even let it affect any aspect of anything; amazing really. I was widely known to be his favourite student, a vocal homophobe & his sexual preferences just were not an issue. It took me two years to even learn he was gay. Remarkable.
* In tears in 3rd year, nearing graduation; he informed me he'd have to take action which would result in my expulsion from University of NSW, and termination of my military career - I'd gotten mixed up with Love for the first time & my life had gone to custard, I'd asked for and received two extensions on the deadline for the 20,000 word final paper (20% of the year's grade), and been denied a third request (quite reasonably, I had been trying to exploit our relationship), so I knuckled down did the reading & wrote a good essay and then we lost power to the building for a sec & computer rebooted, no AutoSave in 2001 or not in my Microsoft Word program, and I never save work intermittently. I lost the whole thing, I was fucked. I had like 20 hrs till deadline, couldn't do it again so I was still going to pass but probably only with a Credit or Distinction mark. But I had nothing else to do as my g/f was ostensibly asleep so I candy-flipped (acid LSD + MDMA - did I tell you this story?) mostly to fuck around & I wrote the paper which I tried to proof-read but none of it made sense so giggling, I printed it off & submitted it. Next week i'm called in, Walker wanted to know who I'd paid to write my essay. I was confused, I didn't remember submitting one in time and told him that, he handed it to me & I read it & vaguely remembered writing it but I agreed it wasn't my writing. I was getting deja vu in some spots as he told me it was the finest paper he'd ever seen from a student in 20 years. I agreed it was brilliant. It was about culture & politics in Java (Indonesia). But I couldn't write like this, so I conceded the obvious. He knew my writing very well by the end of 3 years of a Politics major. He didn't know what to do, ethics compelled him to act & I was giving him nothing, just evasive and contradictory answers because I was probably still high but drawing blanks and confusion trying to make sense of what had happened in the last few days and then I remembered the giggling as I submitted it as a joke and that I had written it all on acid, and suddenly I started claiming it saying "No no no. This is mine actually!" (after saying it wasn't mine - sigh). I would have sounded so ridiculously guilty, he's trying to work out what he's compelled to do & I'm saying "You Have to Believe Me I Remember Writing This Now" (and he's looking at me in agony because we're talking like four days to remember - if you wrote a 20,000 word paper four days ago, you'd remember it ROFL - I didn't want to tell him about the acid, which was dumb in hindsight because he was a libertarian of course), but no one in the world would have believed me nor should they have. I sounded absolutely ridiculous. He was like "Do you have any proof Jonny? I don't know what to say. You've never written anything like this" & because I didn't do one of my standard 4 to 5 drafts I'm like "nup fuck, I just wrote it off the top of my head; ugh I know how that sounds", & with his lip quivering he informed his favourite student that ethics compelled him to report the incident etc, i.e. I was getting expelled. I understood, there's nothing I'd have wanted him to do otherwise, I was cursing my rotten luck all the way back to my room where the first thing I saw was my 30 pages of notes from the two days spent in library reading for it. FML. Ran back down we compared my scribbling to the prose and by the eighth page or so he was satisfied. But top ethics. So impressive. I think I would have lost all respect for him if he'd cut me a favour there.
Amazing lecturer. A decade later, so last year, I heard he was arrested and charged with drugging a student, sexually molesting him and also something like forcible detainment or whatever it's called when you hold someone against their will. Furious, I emailed him; expressing my outrage and asking if there was anything I could do; was there any use in my flying over to appear before the court as a character witness or something - and he taught me one final lesson about the Law.
He said: "No it's all going to be fine. They're just abusing the process."
I didn't understand. How would it be fine if they're abusing the process; wouldn't that mean a conviction?
He's like: "No they can't convict. There is no evidence. They're not fabricating any. They'll be forced to acquit. They're just dragging my name through the mud."
I can only imagine why, but as he didn't tender the reasons I figured he was likely too exhausted to humour my curiosity. But I didn't understand. How could there BE a trial without evidence?
His response made me blush. I hadn't spoken to him since late 2005. He was like, "Didn't you end up becoming a barrister after all? Last I heard, you were accepted."
He had written a glowing referral for my application. And I had been accepted.
Funny thing happened. It's been on my list of things to investigate for awhile now but I don't know how to go about it. It should be easy with a Google search but I've tried a couple times and I get too furious trying to find what should be fairly simple information. Maybe I'm using the wrong search terms. I don't want to read the entire 2005/2006 Australian budget but surely I shouldn't have to confirm or deny the story I was told.
But in 2006 I commenced a juris doctor program at UQ after being accepted, approved for the Masters equivalent of HECS (higher education contribution scheme - loan for tertiary study to be paid back over time at low interest), enrolled which was a fairly intense week of moving from Gold Coast to Brisbane, finding an apartment near UQ, furnishing it, buying textbooks, getting my ID cards, processing all the paperwork, opening all the student club and union accounts which they force onto every student which is expensive & bullshit - the whole process cost close to 10k which I'd earned quickly after paying off the brutal 45k personal loan I left the military with (12% interest). I should have declared bankruptcy but pride and dignity and bullshit. I worked 20 hr days for a year instead. But there I was start of 2006 a couple of weeks into Masters Law and I wanted to be a criminal lawyer or a barrister because I believed in the Law but not in the way the rich had all the advantages during a trial. Hah.
But I was back on track with my career after 9/11 fucked up everything, and I had a new g/f who I was going to marry but she didn't know it yet. I'd basically been in love with her for 17 months working for the same company and we'd never said a word to each other. I wasn't going to ever bother her because every fucking sleaze-ball in the entire company would harass her brazenly - without shame. It was horrifying. I was disgusted. But I adored her.
I don't know if I'd have loved her if I knew she loved the attention. Probably not. But at the time I just assumed she was the definition of grace. She just floated above all the sweaty, grimy toddlers with their bulging pants and lewd drooling and ALL of my friends were sick to death of my expressions of adoration and love for her. 17 months. Not one word. I quit Jupiters Casino to move up to Brisbane and she was clocking off work and we both were in the elevator alone!! for 3 floors. This was providence. I was screaming at myself, "This is the miracle you wanted. If she rejects you, who gives a fuck, you're never coming back to this city again." 2 floors. "Do it. You'll hate yourself forever if you chicken out." 1 floor. "You fucking faggot. Speak. That's an order. SPEAK!" Door opened, she walked out. I continued to the carpark floor, contemplating jumping over the side. There would just be cement there. Wouldn't hurt probably at all from that high up. I disgusted myself.
That was that.
The next day, I'm driving to Brisbane and I stop to pick up tickets for SummaFieldDayze which is like Fun. Happiness. Joy. People laughing. People smiling. No one miserable. No one getting hurt. Everyone beautiful or at least, looking as good as they're ever going to in sunglasses, singlets, dancing in 30 degree sunshine with 30,000 other people having fun. So of course, basically illegal. No one would go if they were sober or...vomit, drunk. Everyone's high. No one ever getting hurt or hurting anyone. Just fun. And I walk into Ticketek and she's there. "Hi" she says, I'm like "hey" then "are you going to summafield..." and my head dropped. Such a stupid thing to say. I fucking hate small talk, so creepy. I was just looking at the ground and she laughed and said "No, I'm going to the Philharmonic Symphony Orchestra's 44th Jubilee..." and she's reading the other concert name off the Ticketek office promo banner, the whole office is covered in SummafieldDayze banners and she's just smiling mischievously and I'd never loved anyone more at that moment.
What the fuck am I rambling about. I'm way too sober to function. But yeah she was great. My friends knew she was a threat to my unhappiness so they casually dispatched her. I'm not imagining it. The racist fucks were manipulating my emotions for a decade. She was making me happy and they couldn't allow that. So they called her a "mail order bride" at the dinner where I was introducing her to everyone. I was like "Where have I flown her in from? Where have you flown in from Iza?" I was looking at my friends smirk, I was completely confused. She's says softly, "It's because I'm Asian."
I was drunk and boisterously loud as I said "Hah what the fuck are you talking about? Why do they think that?" My friends were sitting there, smirking contently. Their g/fs glaring at them in horror. Nothing more eventuated from that 'horror'. The horror wasn't for what they did but for where they did it. They were racists as well. Everyone in Australia is racist. I didn't actually realise this until the Cronulla riots when I got hundreds of texts calling for blood. Just insanity.
I don't see colour in humanity. But you all who do are perfectly sane, I'm sure.
I'm looking at her skin and face asking "wtf is this bullshit about" (meaning what was their bullshit about, not what her nationality bullshit bah...your filthy toddler creepy shit is so horrifying, no one can have fun, everyone loses). She was looking at me thinking "I'd like to leave" but not with the look that said "let's go, we're leaving" but more of the look that said "you're all vomit-inducing, what am I even doing here".
I was pretty much reeling in horror, and she's answers to rattle off her bullshit heritage as if she's a criminal on the dock, accused of being a fraud. "My father's caucasian, mum's half spanish half asian". I'm just trying to work out why we're even having this conversation. She was born in Australia and had never left the country. She was as Australian as anyone I'd ever met. My friends was smirking, as if they'd scored a victory. I had no idea at the time why they believed they had. It wasn't about her. They needed me, and they needed me to be unhappy.
So the girl I loved for 17 months was suddenly a "mail order bride".
I had been having fun. Now everyone at the dinner was quiet, staring at me as if I'm going to do anything? Supposed to do something. I didn't give a fuck about her. It changed nothing. But I was pretty disgusted at the ruining of fun. Might have a few less friends by dessert, but then I never really did whenever I'd think something like that. Too forgiving. Too tolerant. You should have zero tolerance for insanity. It corrupts everything.
She was looking at me because everyone was looking at me as if I had to do or say something. The only thing I could think of was, why did she lie. Hah. My stupid OCD mind couldn't get around the fact that 25% of something doesn't make you something. So I was like "Why do you lie and say you're Asian when you're not? You're only 1/4 so you're not Asian. Why do you claim to be something you're not?"
Stupid. So so stupid. It was innocently asked, of course. I didn't understand. I should have known why. Because why would she deny what everyone else was so desperate to PROVE for her whole life. By denying her heritage it makes her look like she's got something to hide or is ashamed. She didn't give a fuck. Everyone else gave a fuck. So she'd give them what they wanted because they'd never let up if she kept denying it or telling the truth. They're black and white niggers in this world. They can't think in terms of complexity. She's Asian or she's not. They know she is so they'd be "Why are you denying it? Are you embarrassed? You shouldn't be embarrassed. Australia is a multicultural society and you're welcome here as long as you don't bring all your extended families over and fill the place up with your cousins."
And everyone would laugh, because this is the height of comedy. It's NAUGHTY isn't it. So it's funny. Notoriety. And because she was pretty, people really became fuckwits around her because guys wanted to fuck her (and believed they'd be in with a shot, she's Asian after all so she's a whore who loves to fuck - isn't that what they do over there, sex tourism?). And their g/fs would be threatened by her, thinking she was a whore. But I knew none of this at the time.
She just looked at me, kinda over it all, exhausted by the faggotry of a lifetime, she wasn't too impressed with my question. She was disappointed I didn't get it, not really even wanting to explain as I waited for the answer. "Cause I'm hot Asian?" with a kind of "What do you want me to say?" shrug, and a shake of her head. I answered it.
"But you're not. You're not Asian. So you shouldn't lie and say that you are, if you're not."
Stupid OCD - fuck you filthy fucks and your filthy religious horror and race and faggotry and creepy fucking hatred of Fun. Most of you should die really, you're so vile it's unbelievable.
We never recovered. My friends all 'apologised' later, then continued to pollute everything with their 'subtle' innuendos and 'naughty' insanity. Giggling and smirking. They needed to get rid of her. She was a huge threat to my unhappiness. I figured this all out reading "A Perfect Spy" years later. They were clinical, ruthless and brutal in hindsight. I was just spinning in horror. We went out a few more months of fighting but we were doomed from that night.
We never stood a chance.
The very next day, in the middle of a Constitutional Law lecture, someone from UQ Administration came in with a security guard and asked for my name. In the middle of class. It was the most obscure thing. As if I was a threat, stealing an education. They asked me to leave with them, and I'm like "What's this about?" and they're like looking around awkwardly as if I've done something really embarrassing and now the entire lecture room is looking at me, and the Rector's dogsbody says "Maybe it's best if we talk in private?"
I assume someone has died. My throat was dry as I followed her to her office.
Where she demanded my university ID. I'm like "I'm sorry?" She says I haven't paid enrolment. I'm like "Aren't you supposed to have all that sorted with the Federal Government?" She shrugged. Apparently not.
Something very creepy happened here. This is all true by the way. I had no idea what was going on. I hand her my ID and the security guard escorts me off the campus grounds. Like seriously WTF? It's UQ. Anyone from the public is allowed to walk freely through UQ. It's not a military base! Just insane shit.
I was tripping out and so furious as I stormed into Centrelink because someone had fucked up and I was in no mood for incompetent fucks. I wait two hours with junkies, bums, scratching themselves, drunks, prostitutes, before my number is called. I try to take a deep breath but I end up just shouting "What the fuck, everything was sorted, I did this months ago, if I have to defer so help me god..." I was just ranting furiously thinking I'd have to get a job for a year because of some incompetent fuck-up.
The lady was opening my case file on the system and said softly, "There was a mistake in approving your [whatever the HECS for masters degrees was called] loan. In the last budget they discontinued the scheme for masters degrees."
I was floored. I had been expecting confusion, apologies, someone had screwed up blah blah. I hadn't be expected this life-changing news. I couldn't believe I hadn't heard of it. The budgets go down midyear. Not once did I think "How is this error even possible?" (my approval, which had been confirmed for months). All I could think was embarrassment at my yelling at this poor lady when obviously it was my fault for not researching it or something. My world was spinning. I said "Um...oh...sorry then. Um...that's that then I guess."
She shrugged, sympathetically. I walked out. That was that. I didn't have $105,000 lying around so...
That was that.
Something's not right though. Something shady happened there. I could never put the dots together in the chaos that followed because Iza and I had started so amazingly and after the mail order bride racism started, it was all so miserable. Fighting, love. Insanity. Mistrust. Bitterness. Once religion has poisoned something it's almost impossible to ever get it pure again.
But if the Australian budget for the 2005/2006 financial year didn't remove the Masters component of the Higher Education Contribution Scheme, I have a serious mystery to chase up. Because that's what I was told when I was pulled out of Law mid-class three weeks into the program. Someone look it up for me will you? Every time I Google it I want to break something like a laptop.
It destroyed me. I was destroyed. I'd worked a long time to refocus after the Coalition of the Bloodthirsty ruined 4 years of work. And now random budget cuts ruined 4 years. I had no job. My money ran out so fast with Iza guilt-tripping at how horrible I'd been when we'd fight. Love when it's in pain is an ugly insanity. She could hold her own. Not sure I could. I knew I was going insane but I was wrong. I was already insane.
We broke up but I loved her for four years after until I met Aun who killed me. During that time I hurt a lot of people. Made a couple million USD playing poker. Had zero fun. No happiness. Misery and confusion and more and more betrayal from friends had me flying overseas the following year in horror.
They Loved me. Or at least, they needed me enough to make my life Hell. Isa wasn't the start of anything. She was the end of their decade of torture. They'd been doing this since ADFA, where there must have been an unspoken agreement to knock me down. I was too full of life. For a decade I believed I was unattractive to the point of being UGLY. I didn't mind so much, it was the contradictions that bothered me. Some cute girls seemed to disagree. How did that make sense? Crazy, I assumed. 98% of girls were pretty conclusive, not interested. This was a lie actually, I would hook up with cute girls, fuck up the conversion from club > home (like 100% of the time almost, but then they'd meet my friends so...my friends were cool, I would show them this to show them I was cool, because I didn't think I was cool - the irony). Anyway I literally have no idea what I look like. I never have. I think 6.5 7 on a good day. But I wouldn't honestly know. My friends, when this was driving me crazy at ADFA when I begged a couple of them to just drop all the shit and give it to be straight, life or death serious and I swore never to mention it again. I asked them, "On a scale of one to 10, how bad is it?" and they both went very sober and serious and uncomfortable and one said "You're Ugly, sorry mate" - I was like "That's fine, Ugly or UGLY ugly", and he said "Pretty ugly" and looked really uncomfortable so I thanked him. Never to be mentioned again. It was good to know but I got a second opinion, just in case. "3 out of 10." That settled it.
I dunno. I don't think anyone really knows for sure what they look like because everyone fucking lies so much everything you think you know is just an illusion. I do know that I fucked up a lot of shit believing I was 3/10 in the decade that followed, if we assume I'm not. And I assume I'm 7. I don't give a fuck. I just need accurate information or everything gets fucked up. You cannot operate in a world of lies. You can fuck up so much shit with bad Intelligence. Girls would be flirting with me and I assumed they were just blind drunk or fucking with me or something, I wasn't interested in playing idiotic games and they'd be too cute to possibly be into a 3/10. And some other friends I'd be with might be like "She's into you, are you going to do something?" And I'd lose the fucking plot.
Because fucking hell. "You're a cunt as well?" I'd swear at them, knock shit over, fucking alcohol is filthy poison. I'd be steaming furious, disgusted at their mocking me, and just go home. So many nights I went home. I should kill those motherfuckers. But I won't. I never do. I don't think that's why they do. They do because they don't know how to have fun. They knew I did. They needed me. They sucked the life out of me and I ran overseas. Aun eventually ripped me apart but we were both insane. Died in late Oct 2010 or should have, in any case. And here we are.
You're all Catholic Toddlers to me and I'm pretty sure most of you are so vile and deceitful with your endless Confidence Tricks you could just go ahead and noose without the world losing much at all? Something to seriously think about, in any case.
_________
I quickly explained to John Walker that I ended up doing something else and wished him well for the conclusion of the ludicrous sham trial. Of course he was acquitted. They had a four-month trial with no evidence. This is how fucking ridiculous the legal system is in a first world nation with a history of advanced jurisprudence. It's a fucking abomination of a joke. You're all just too stupid.
They just needed to charge him for Google.
Named dragged through mud. Fucking Toddlers you fucking imbeciles think the Law is there to protect you. I should kill you all and somehow keep you alive to show you how easily I could run circles around the illusion that is the Protection Racket of the Law.
Alternatively I could smoke. That's against the Law, you know.
Anyway apart from Walker, the other lecturers were imbeciles. I almost failed Econ 101 on Day 1 when I laughed because I thought they were making a mystical joke about Supply v Demand and this hocus pocus "Invisible Hand". I was 100% right as it turns out, but I was mocking it because it sounded ludicrously mystical and illogical. How could it regulate greed? They weren't joking, I stopped laughing pretty quickly. They were right wing economist imbeciles who TRULY believed that zero regulation was the most efficient. So they were idiots.
But they knew everything. So when I pressed them for an answer to a question I'd asked about The Invisible Hand, they got shirty and things got v tense and I thought, "Is it worth being thrown out of this course over this?" And I toed the line. A decade later I'm like "motherfuckers". The banks had just orchestrated a hijack to force the world's governments into bailing them out. So much corruption involved. So many lies. You Toddlers have no fucking idea. You just don't care though. You're snivelling little rodents, at ground level. I understand.
Complete vindication of my 17 year old position on Day 1 of Econ 101. If I had pursued that line of questioning, I'd probably get thrown out of School of Economics, which would have implications for my degree / career. I don't like "what if" games. I'm just showing you what "formal education' is all about. It's a farcical joke. Undergraduate brainwashing. You can graduate with a paper informing anyone that looks at it that you've been lied to for 3 years, 4 years with honours.
I learned nothing about Economics in two years. They were really idiotic lecturers. I learned about Keynes and his genius much later; just reading and thinking on my own. You don't need a formal education. What I'm not certain of is how badly you _don't_ need one.
Quote:
this- good and bad luck are forces of nature which act upon persons based on the will of the land (or people?) and they are directly influneced by ones actions.
Sounds likes mysticism.
Quote:
If you act in favor of society, and contribute good things, you become "LUCKY" while on the other hand if you are a selfish perosn who does nothing for anyone, you suffer "BAD LUCK"
No, luck is random. You're talking about karma. Karma doesn't really exist; at least, not in the way the Taoist religions imagine it. But it does exist very loosely in a vague sense that if you're acting in the best interests of Society and contributing, you will be benefiting yourself. If you act as a Self-less person (a Selfish person acts intelligently) who does nothing for anyone, you won't be acting in the best interests of yourSelf because you'll be insane.
But you don't want to be focused on acting in the best interests of Society. That's what people who get children to die for them want everyone to do. You want to be acting in the best interests of yourSelf at all times, and you cannot live well without a happy, functioning Society so your Selfish interests will include the interests of all.
The Game Theory for Humanity:
United we Rise and Prosper and Progress in the Business of Living to Ensure the Optimality of Mutually Inclusive Happiness; or
Divided we Fall into Ruin where we Will be Disintegrate into Pockets of Infighting and Conflict forced to Survive as Slaves in a Shameful Occupation where we will be Used until there is No Use in Keeping Us Barely Alive, at Which Point we Will Die Unless We Find a Way to be Deemed of Use or Unless We Find a Way to Make Use of Other Slaves Who Will be Kept Alive for as Long as Power Needs Pyramids which Must be Built, Wars which Must be Fought, and Bodies which Must be Bred to expend on both Costly Endeavours.
Which one do you think we're pulling off?
I rambled in some of my notes about Utopia that should be the reality. Not sure if I can be bothered even posting this brilliance. Irrefutable logic but then idiotic Toddlers (like the toddlers you all are) have never been into logic, so what's the point. Just breed for your owners. Run your Confidence Tricks. Lie to the world world and snicker at how incorrigible you are. I would flick the switch Off on this world. None of you are remotely bright enough to realise the true horror. 3500 years of snivelling. Going backwards.
Quote:
as a person who can see things from a broader perspective, what do you think?
Nonsense. The market doesn't work that way.
Quote:
My idea comes from the followiung-- a year or so ago, I asked a buddy of mine to play poker. He was doing quite well for himself as a computer analyst (has a degree in applied mathematics as well as economics) and essentially he had saved over 600k the last 8-9 years of working (when i say he was good with money, he taped his shoes together, wore t-shirts he had since he was 12, had NEVER bought a single cell phone, nor had he ever moved out of his parents place- at 36) and I felt this guy might make a KILLING playing poker. So intelligent, good with math, great with money etc etc.
Poor guy. That's no way to live. What was he hoarding for?
Quote:
He not only would not play, he woudl not accept any kind of stake from me. I tried to give him $10, he refused. He flat refused, said he was anti- gambling and would not relent.
This is fair. Gambling is pure exploitation.
Quote:
I asked him what his reason was (naturally inquisitive) and he says to me "Michael, one of the fundamentals I learned in Econ was that society by and large tends to reward people with money for providing a service or goods to the community" Essentially his philosophy was that money was a gift of sorts to people for contributing to society. Ergo, if you offer nothing of benefit, you will not make money, at least long term.
That's a very antiquated, schoolboy appreciation of the market but no, it's not correct. It would be, if people weren't imbecilic. But insanity changes it to be incorrect. Every product being sold is being sold to maximise profits; which has no correlation to quality.
In fact, the truth is that there is an inverse correlation with quality. There is nothing counter-intuitive about this fact. Bright people understand this intuitively. Dumb people need to understand that the consumer isn't bright enough to dictate squat. The Toddler consumer is lazy. The Toddler just looks to someone they trust like Oprah or a sports star they like and that's why they use that brand of cereal or soap or car wax.
If you're struggling to understand the inverse correlation between quality and profit, you can understand it pretty quickly by researching the invention of the lightbulb. I think, and I'm too lazy to look it up because it doesn't really matter, but I think the first light bulb is still glowing.
Yours don't last a century though, do they? There's your illumination of the issue of Supply v Demand.
I don't have the Zen to write about the product of "pain relief" but if you think about the Suppliers of that product in a marketplace without Demand, connect the dots on what they're going to do.
That's what's happening with every unnecessary product. Demand is being manufactured by those who control the Supply.
Quote:
He refused to back down on this and wouldn't you know it, over time poker all but died.
That's not why poker died. Poker died because the house rapes it with horrendous vig. But talking about poker is for faggots.
Quote:
Do you fancy him crazy? He has his masters from UCLA, with ~4.0 GPA, he's quite intelligent. What do you think of this philosophy?
He's not crazy. He's just not nearly as bright as I am. And he would have gotten destroyed at poker because he thinks inside the box they give him to think. Everything intelligent or insightful is outside that box.
Quote:
As a small experiment I have spent the last few weeks doing everything I can to help people, from my neighbors to my parents to just about anyone I can, and at the same time I have suffered in quiet (yesterday for example I had to walk home over 2.2 m iles carrying 5 bags of laundry weighing over 40lbs, much of the distance uphill and in 90 degree heat) hoping that I am "PAYING MY DUES" so to speak, and hopefully my luck will turn around.
I don't know what this stuff is. That's not how shit works. You need to be focused on yourSelf, then you focus on others. If you're focused on others, they will exploit you. Or you will exploit yourSelf with that retarded Christian noose.
Pay your dues by getting back on your feet, then worry about other people. If it's a choice between you or them, you choose you when you cannot afford not to. Then when you can afford not to, you'd be insane to choose to hoard over helping others live without pain.
Quote:
Since I have not only gotten back on food stamps, received cash aid, my foot is in the door with the US NAVY (officially I intend to go in as a Hospital Corpsman-an ideal IDEAL job for me!) and overall I am so happy JV, you have no idea. I feel like the weight of the world has been lifted from my back. I really do.
That's good.
Quote:
What do you think? What's going on here, in reality? How do you see things?
I think if I have to put up with much more Catholic emotional insanity, I'm going to break the law. I just can't live in a world of fucking insane Toddlers. I might post about this fucking lying WHORE. I've been furious all week in horror at Christianity infecting Thailand. That's two in a fortnight back. Lost my best friend to Christianity. She thought she could hurt my feelings. Ugh. She's an idiot now. I can't even talk to her, she's all awkward and shit.
So Rum Dick in this thread or another thread made reference to prostitutes and I spoke about their Catholicism preventing them from being tolerable to be around.
At Route66 (big dance club in RCA in Bangkok - no whores), I meet this very cute girl and take her home. She's lying non-stop without my realising it until she accidentally admits it after she's left and gone home and suddenly it all makes sense. Until she admitted she was a Whore (the difference between prostitution and whoring is honesty v deceit) when she got home and got on Facebook, her insanity was flipping me out.
I was not tired. She was sleeping. She kept waking up even though I wasn't making a sound, and telling me to get some sleep. What the fuck. I'm 31 years old. I don't need to be told by a girl when to sleep and when not to sleep in my own fucking hotel room. I don't need her guidance, or permission. You know what I mean?
The first half a dozen times I let it slide, the next half a dozen times the horror. She just would not stop telling me I should get some sleep. Literally on the 10th or 12th time, I tell her to SHUT THE FUCK UP. I escalated obviously, in firmness from about the 5th or 6th instance. She did shut up, at that and about an hour or two later I got into bed and crashed out.
An hour or two after that, she wakes up and wants to go home. So she wakes me up. No reason. To say Goodbye? To walk her to the elevator? All fucking moronic shit. I'm tired and she keeps waking me up, I'm telling her "Goodbye, I'll call you tomorrow" but no. She's not happy until I'm up out of bed, glaring at her, getting dressed. Trying to make sense of this horror.
You can work out the rest from my semi-emotional rant because she was LYING the entire fucking time. She's a WHORE. It doesn't matter that she wasn't working. She was lying claiming to be studying, working at her father's business (something automotive or manufacturing). She was just lying in shame about being a prostitute. And that makes her a WHORE.
I don't want to hang out with prostitutes or whores. Because they've all been infected by Christian clients. And they are fucking insane as a result. Shock39 is a freelance club. She's a prostitute. Lying fucking...the insanity all makes sense.
I cannot handle insanity. This fucking Catholic a;lsdflij
Utopia is pure realism. Realistically speaking, if this planet existed 1000 times 999 of the time it would exist in Utopia by now. The insanity you believe is your Reality is the statistical outlier because humans are not born insane. If imbeciles were not demented enough to believe their insanity was acceptable just because it's normal, we'd live in Utopia for real. The insane would not be interested in making anyone else insane, and any that were so tortured that they insisted or persisted would be attended to immediately in the sanest, gentlest, kindest, tenderest and humane way possible.
In Utopia, the entire human race will be obsessed with ensuring Zero Tolerance for Insanity and Zero Tolerance for Pain. You don't get the option to live in chronic or indefinite pain, because you will scream it. And you cannot be allowed to share pain. It's inhumane. You will live in a Neutral or better emotional state or you will be treated the only humane way. You will be tenderly rested in peace.
You do not have a right to share your pain.
You do not have a right to share your insanity. It doesn't matter if you think you're sane. If you cannot make the logical case for why you are failing to act in the best interests of yourSelf, you will be treated by Humanity with the utmost humane tenderness.
You do not have a right to express opinions which are illogical.
You do not have a right to want what you cannot logically claim should be yours to use.
You do not have a right to own anything you are not Selfishly using.
You do not have a right to give away what is not yours.
You do not have a right to make people do what you cannot convince them to do without the use of coercion or force or threats or power. The only power you have the right to exert is the power of logical arguments to persuade others to act in the best interests of yourSelf. Convince them to see why their actions benefit you, and if you are convincing you will understand which of your desires are sane and which of your desires have been inserted into you by the Insane who make you scream because they don't understand a damn thing. They just feel they know everything already because they're brighter than almost everyone they meet. We're all stupid. We've all be made to be insane.
You do not have a right to be insane.
You do not have a right to be stupid when your stupidity is hurting yourSelf and Humanity.
You do not have a right to be so stupid that you would imagine people having fun could be hurting you somehow. That's insane.
You do not have a right to be so vile that you would prevent humans from having fun; not even when they exclude you and especially not when you cannot understand how they could believe what they're doing is fun. If they are not hurting anybody with their actions, you do not have the right to kill Humanity with your insane hatred of fun.
You do not have a right to lie about what you cannot know, and misrepresent it as being Truth. You have the right to believe whatever you can logically prove, and beyond that you can believe anything which doesn't affect the rights of others who do not share your beliefs. Any harmless beliefs you cannot prove using logic, you must represent as your fantasy. Misrepresent your fantasy as Truth and you must be attended to in the most humane possible way.
You do not have the right to tolerate those who restrict anyone from doing anything they want to do, which does not hurt anyone else. If a human being who belongs to the interconnected Humanity wishes to traverse from A to B you do not have a right to restrict them from doing so. Of course you should ask for their reason/s; perhaps you wish to go the same way? If they refuse to give you a reason or if they say their reasons are classified then you must attend to them with the utmost humane care a human being who is not willing to be sane needs. Every human being needs to be given the option to live a life without suffering. And that means anyone who isn't willing to lay all their cards on the table all the time - you couldn't possibly be stupid enough to accept any excuses for why they're unable to be an open book - must be humanely and tenderly removed from the game they are corrupting.
You do not have a right to draw imaginary lines on cartoon maps or pictures taken from space and say "you cannot go here" or "you cannot go there". You do not own the planet. You do not possess anything your insanity believes you own. If you feel otherwise you should be given the option to make the logical case before you're humanely removed from the game.
You do not have the right to hoard anything that can be used to eliminate human suffering, without making the logical case for the temporary restriction of its use as being a more efficient way to ensure the elimination of human suffering.
You do not have the right to create real human suffering to ease the imaginary suffering of the insane. A child being forced to make sneakers is a Crime against Humanity. A human being forced to do anything they don't want to do when what they want to do isn't hurting anyone else, is a Crime against Humanity. Your imagined sensibilities and delusional and illogical feelings are insane and a Crime against Humanity. You cannot protect your children from trauma by giving traumatised insane people the power to traumatise your children. If you do not understand that, you do not have the sanity to function let alone create a healthy life. There is nothing traumatic in this world that isn't made to be traumatic by the traumatised imbeciles who give traumatic illusions their power to hurt imaginations. If you and your toddler come across roadkill you are insane if you do not use the opportunity to explain what when wrong for that animal or human. There is nothing horrifying about death, but the way to ensure a horrified world of sociopathic killing is to pretend that illogical errors of judgement are a terror that must be feared with panic and trauma that creates horror. If you see a decapitated head, you must explain to the child what the mind of that head thought prior to explaining that the head being severed from the body is not the end of the world but merely the end of the fun for that person.
You do not have the right to impose your fears onto children who are not afraid until you infect them with your insanity. The difference between fear and caution is the difference between insanity and being alert, knowledgeable and aware. Humans who are aware understand the consequences of their actions. They take intelligent risks and they require as much information as possible in order to do that. Humans that are sane have an appreciation of risk. They understand why people take risks (in traffic, unless they're driving an ambulance or racing to a genuine emergency, taking risks is insane - your dumb shit is never worth the risks you take after making a mistake or fucking up your schedule. You imbeciles. If it wasn't important enough not to fuck up, how important can it really be?)
You do not have the right to teach your children what you cannot logically justify and anyone who tells you that your children are your property to do with as you like must receive the most gentle and tender humane attention. Those who told you this lie about the children that belong to an interconnected Humanity are breeders of slaves and self-perpetuating pain.
You do not have the right to create children who are insane. It doesn't matter whether you believe you should have the right, because the product of your insanity will hurt everyone. Your child does not belong to you because you do not have the right to create a ticking time-bomb for Humanity.
We are an interconnected Humanity and there is only one way we will ever again be humane. You must give up all your insane 'rights' because the only right you have and the only right you could possibly want is to live a life free from pain.
The only way that is even possible is if those who will make you suffer from their pain-producing 'opinions' are treated with the utmost gentle humane attention possible. Your 'rights' that they have given you are your chains to pain. You're an imbecile for needing me to explain this simplest of all logical concepts. You're an imbecile if you still cannot understand why you should have the right to cause suffering.
You do not have the right to remain silent. Your Miranda rights are a fucking illusion that hurts everyone. You have the right to be sane. If you have done something insane which has hurt someone who is not yourSelf, you have the right to explain your logic and your motives for why you created pain. If you have done something sane which has not hurt someone who is not yourSelf, no one has the right to legislate against your having fun without hurting anybody. That, you imbeciles, is how Law makes slavery legal. That, you imbeciles, is how the Law makes insanity legal.
You do not have the right to control the actions of others. Convince them of the logical case for why they should act in your mutual best interests without hurting anybody or you must be treated with the most humane and gentle attention possible, in consideration of your insanity.
You do not have the right to override "free will" which is being exercised without hurting anybody else. That is how the breeders of insane slaves kill millions of humans in wars which are, by definition, insane.
You do not have the right to take your illusionary pain and create suffering that is real. If the sound of children laughing bothers you, unless you want to be placed into permanent peace, you will address Your Problem without affecting their fun. If you prevent someone from having fun because you feel something else is more important than fun, and you cannot make the case for why you believe something is more important than fun, you must be treated to with the utmost gentle humane attention. And only the insane have a problem with fun that doesn't hurt anybody else. Fun and Happiness in this corrupted world that is prevented is almost always the action of insanity. In Utopia, everyone will be given BOSE (or a superior brand's) sound-cancelling headphones and light-cancelling eye patches to be worn if they do not wish to participate in fun for whatever reason.
You do not have the right to manipulate humans or to deceive humans or to lie in any fucking way. This is inclusive of:
failure to disclose
'white' lies (lying doesn't get any darker)
lies for politeness sake (nothing is impolite except deception, hurting others or preventing the rights of the sane to act without hurting anyone else - forcing others to consider the insane imaginations of those who get offended by 'inconsiderate' fun, by 'rude' truth or by the 'indecent' failure to consider their emotional insanity is a Crime against Humanity)
lies for diplomatic considerations (it is insane to lie for peace)
lies for social cohesion (your deceitful small talk is a provocation that fairly warrants immediate humane attention for you have disturbed the peace with your insulting unsolicited 'harmless' solicitation - to the insane, the screaming of the solicitors of the world sounds pleasant)
lies to protect (humanity needs to be protected from anyone who would lie to protect anyone from transparency and illumination and reflection - this is a world in which you are presently the victim of countless painfully-obvious Protection Rackets, and the victims of Protection Rackets are always too stupid to understand that humans only ever need protection from Those Who Would Make Them Afraid).
You do not have the right to imagine you could be happy by making another person suffer.
You do not have the right to tolerate suffering - even self-inflicted - which was intended to 'please' you.
You do not have the right to be stupid. Stupidity is defined as believing you have the right to create suffering for "the greater good". You cannot be as stupid as those brilliant but corrupted minds who control the entire world. They create suffering telling themselves it's for the best. They are not willing to make the logical case for how this can even be possible. They are creeps who are victims of a very sick corruption which denies the rights of human beings to live without pain.
The fundamental right of Humanity is to permanently exist in an neutral or happier state.
You do not have the right to be a snivelling Toddler who doesn't care about your own best Interests.
You do not have the right to believe what has been proven false.
You do not have the right to your Faith if your Faith is not in the best interests of Humanity. Asserting, for example, that the words written in the 31st chapter of the Holy Bible's book of Numbers are the words of anything other than a sociopathic demonic victim of insanity and pain would give you the right to be attended to instantly with the most humane and gentle tenderness your insanity permits.
You do not have the right to Freedom of Evil Mysticism.
You do not have the right to print and publish Insanity that asserts that suffering is ever okay.
You do not have the right to tolerate those who claim they have the right to hurt other people.
We are an Interconnected Humanity and almost all of you imbeciles have failed Logic 101.
You do not have the right to make others suffer in order to Please you. You couldn't possibly be that evil and yet you are. This is ignorance blurred with insanity. You cannot control humans and be simultaneously sane. You will never be happy creating misery; what imbeciles could even imagine such a thing.
You do not have the right to be narcissistic. You couldn't possibly be so stupid as to think those around you cannot affect your happiness or inflict pain. If you believe this you are insane. How can everyone have screwed up Logic this horribly?
In a world of neutrality, you would not be compelled to push forward but you would not be permitted to pull back on Humanity. Anyone may 'anchor' themselves in Neutral to allow themselves to be swept forward by the sheer physics of progress. Newton's Third Law of Motion: To every action there is always an equal and opposite reaction. If the entire population of Utopia rested weightlessly in Neutral, a single man, woman or child could could take a single step forward for themSelves and all of Utopia would progress.
Utopia is the most Selfish world a sane person can imagine. For this reason, all of Humanity cares about all of Humanity because any human being is both a potential source of happiness and a potential source of suffering. In Utopia, everyone primarily loves themSelves. For this reason, all of Humanity is intelligently loved. We are one race. One species. One Humanity. One Love.
In Utopia there is no Selflessness, no Messiahs, no martyrs, no Self-sacrifice, no Pity, no Compassion, no Coercion, no Pressure, no one imagines they should force another person to do anything; everyone only cares about themSelves. If you're a Selfless sort of person, you'd be miserable in such a Selfish world.
There is no justice in reality and Utopia would be the literal embodiment of all that is real. If you prevented someone from doing something they wanted to do, even if you grabbed their arm and prevented them from taking a single step forward, you would need a reason that was instantly acceptable and understandable. If the reason was not in their interests, like - for example - if they were no longer amused by your insanity and no longer believed there was comedic value in listening to your earnest delusions, only for you to prevent them from continuing on your way, all of Utopia would stop what they were doing and pay attention for as long as necessary until the threat (that would be you) has been humanely Rested In Peace.
There would be no horror, merely attentiveness. No scorn, no pity, no contempt, no derision. Unemotional alertness to the danger of Insanity which would never be feared beyond fearing the fear Insanity (left unattended) creates.
Anyway apart from Walker, the other lecturers were imbeciles. I almost failed Econ 101 on Day 1 when I laughed because I thought they were making a mystical joke about Supply v Demand and this hocus pocus "Invisible Hand". I was 100% right as it turns out, but I was mocking it because it sounded ludicrously mystical and illogical. How could it regulate greed? They weren't joking, I stopped laughing pretty quickly. They were right wing economist imbeciles who TRULY believed that zero regulation was the most efficient. So they were idiots.
But they knew everything. So when I pressed them for an answer to a question I'd asked about The Invisible Hand, they got shirty and things got v tense and I thought, "Is it worth being thrown out of this course over this?" And I toed the line. A decade later I'm like "motherfuckers". The banks had just orchestrated a hijack to force the world's governments into bailing them out. So much corruption involved. So many lies. You Toddlers have no fucking idea. You just don't care though. You're snivelling little rodents, at ground level. I understand.
Complete vindication of my 17 year old position on Day 1 of Econ 101. If I had pursued that line of questioning, I'd probably get thrown out of School of Economics, which would have implications for my degree / career. I don't like "what if" games. I'm just showing you what "formal education' is all about. It's a farcical joke. Undergraduate brainwashing. You can graduate with a paper informing anyone that looks at it that you've been lied to for 3 years, 4 years with honours.
I learned nothing about Economics in two years. They were really idiotic lecturers. I learned about Keynes and his genius much later; just reading and thinking on my own. You don't need a formal education. What I'm not certain of is how badly you _don't_ need one.
Sounds likes mysticism.
No, luck is random. You're talking about karma. Karma doesn't really exist; at least, not in the way the Taoist religions imagine it. But it does exist very loosely in a vague sense that if you're acting in the best interests of Society and contributing, you will be benefiting yourself. If you act as a Self-less person (a Selfish person acts intelligently) who does nothing for anyone, you won't be acting in the best interests of yourSelf because you'll be insane.
But you don't want to be focused on acting in the best interests of Society. That's what people who get children to die for them want everyone to do. You want to be acting in the best interests of yourSelf at all times, and you cannot live well without a happy, functioning Society so your Selfish interests will include the interests of all.
The Game Theory for Humanity:
United we Rise and Prosper and Progress in the Business of Living to Ensure the Optimality of Mutually Inclusive Happiness; or
Divided we Fall into Ruin where we Will be Disintegrate into Pockets of Infighting and Conflict forced to Survive as Slaves in a Shameful Occupation where we will be Used until there is No Use in Keeping Us Barely Alive, at Which Point we Will Die Unless We Find a Way to be Deemed of Use or Unless We Find a Way to Make Use of Other Slaves Who Will be Kept Alive for as Long as Power Needs Pyramids which Must be Built, Wars which Must be Fought, and Bodies which Must be Bred to expend on both Costly Endeavours.
Which one do you think we're pulling off?
I rambled in some of my notes about Utopia that should be the reality. Not sure if I can be bothered even posting this brilliance. Irrefutable logic but then idiotic Toddlers (like the toddlers you all are) have never been into logic, so what's the point. Just breed for your owners. Run your Confidence Tricks. Lie to the world world and snicker at how incorrigible you are. I would flick the switch Off on this world. None of you are remotely bright enough to realise the true horror. 3500 years of snivelling. Going backwards.
Nonsense. The market doesn't work that way.
Poor guy. That's no way to live. What was he hoarding for?
This is fair. Gambling is pure exploitation.
That's a very antiquated, schoolboy appreciation of the market but no, it's not correct. It would be, if people weren't imbecilic. But insanity changes it to be incorrect. Every product being sold is being sold to maximise profits; which has no correlation to quality.
In fact, the truth is that there is an inverse correlation with quality. There is nothing counter-intuitive about this fact. Bright people understand this intuitively. Dumb people need to understand that the consumer isn't bright enough to dictate squat. The Toddler consumer is lazy. The Toddler just looks to someone they trust like Oprah or a sports star they like and that's why they use that brand of cereal or soap or car wax.
If you're struggling to understand the inverse correlation between quality and profit, you can understand it pretty quickly by researching the invention of the lightbulb. I think, and I'm too lazy to look it up because it doesn't really matter, but I think the first light bulb is still glowing.
Yours don't last a century though, do they? There's your illumination of the issue of Supply v Demand.
I don't have the Zen to write about the product of "pain relief" but if you think about the Suppliers of that product in a marketplace without Demand, connect the dots on what they're going to do.
That's what's happening with every unnecessary product. Demand is being manufactured by those who control the Supply.
That's not why poker died. Poker died because the house rapes it with horrendous vig. But talking about poker is for faggots.
He's not crazy. He's just not nearly as bright as I am. And he would have gotten destroyed at poker because he thinks inside the box they give him to think. Everything intelligent or insightful is outside that box.
I don't know what this stuff is. That's not how shit works. You need to be focused on yourSelf, then you focus on others. If you're focused on others, they will exploit you. Or you will exploit yourSelf with that retarded Christian noose.
Pay your dues by getting back on your feet, then worry about other people. If it's a choice between you or them, you choose you when you cannot afford not to. Then when you can afford not to, you'd be insane to choose to hoard over helping others live without pain.
That's good.
I think if I have to put up with much more Catholic emotional insanity, I'm going to break the law. I just can't live in a world of fucking insane Toddlers. I might post about this fucking lying WHORE. I've been furious all week in horror at Christianity infecting Thailand. That's two in a fortnight back. Lost my best friend to Christianity. She thought she could hurt my feelings. Ugh. She's an idiot now. I can't even talk to her, she's all awkward and shit.
Just wanted to say I read every word and this is easily one of your top 10 posts (in my humblest)
Kind of goes this way and that, but your tone these days is much more...mellow? Still sharp, just much more tolerable. I can understand you and your intentions much more clearly, hopefully the feedback means something.
The delivery of content in this format (written text) matters a great deal if one is not skimming (I stopped doing that a while ago). .02$
Utopia is pure realism. Realistically speaking, if this planet existed 1000 times 999 of the time it would exist in Utopia by now. The insanity you believe is your Reality is the statistical outlier because humans are not born insane. If imbeciles were not demented enough to believe their insanity was acceptable just because it's normal, we'd live in Utopia for real. The insane would not be interested in making anyone else insane, and any that were so tortured that they insisted or persisted would be attended to immediately in the sanest, gentlest, kindest, tenderest and humane way possible.
In Utopia, the entire human race will be obsessed with ensuring Zero Tolerance for Insanity and Zero Tolerance for Pain. You don't get the option to live in chronic or indefinite pain, because you will scream it. And you cannot be allowed to share pain. It's inhumane. You will live in a Neutral or better emotional state or you will be treated the only humane way. You will be tenderly rested in peace.
You do not have a right to share your pain.
You do not have a right to share your insanity. It doesn't matter if you think you're sane. If you cannot make the logical case for why you are failing to act in the best interests of yourSelf, you will be treated by Humanity with the utmost humane tenderness.
You do not have a right to express opinions which are illogical.
You do not have a right to want what you cannot logically claim should be yours to use.
You do not have a right to own anything you are not Selfishly using.
You do not have a right to give away what is not yours.
You do not have a right to make people do what you cannot convince them to do without the use of coercion or force or threats or power. The only power you have the right to exert is the power of logical arguments to persuade others to act in the best interests of yourSelf. Convince them to see why their actions benefit you, and if you are convincing you will understand which of your desires are sane and which of your desires have been inserted into you by the Insane who make you scream because they don't understand a damn thing. They just feel they know everything already because they're brighter than almost everyone they meet. We're all stupid. We've all be made to be insane.
You do not have a right to be insane.
You do not have a right to be stupid when your stupidity is hurting yourSelf and Humanity.
You do not have a right to be so stupid that you would imagine people having fun could be hurting you somehow. That's insane.
You do not have a right to be so vile that you would prevent humans from having fun; not even when they exclude you and especially not when you cannot understand how they could believe what they're doing is fun. If they are not hurting anybody with their actions, you do not have the right to kill Humanity with your insane hatred of fun.
You do not have a right to lie about what you cannot know, and misrepresent it as being Truth. You have the right to believe whatever you can logically prove, and beyond that you can believe anything which doesn't affect the rights of others who do not share your beliefs. Any harmless beliefs you cannot prove using logic, you must represent as your fantasy. Misrepresent your fantasy as Truth and you must be attended to in the most humane possible way.
You do not have the right to tolerate those who restrict anyone from doing anything they want to do, which does not hurt anyone else. If a human being who belongs to the interconnected Humanity wishes to traverse from A to B you do not have a right to restrict them from doing so. Of course you should ask for their reason/s; perhaps you wish to go the same way? If they refuse to give you a reason or if they say their reasons are classified then you must attend to them with the utmost humane care a human being who is not willing to be sane needs. Every human being needs to be given the option to live a life without suffering. And that means anyone who isn't willing to lay all their cards on the table all the time - you couldn't possibly be stupid enough to accept any excuses for why they're unable to be an open book - must be humanely and tenderly removed from the game they are corrupting.
You do not have a right to draw imaginary lines on cartoon maps or pictures taken from space and say "you cannot go here" or "you cannot go there". You do not own the planet. You do not possess anything your insanity believes you own. If you feel otherwise you should be given the option to make the logical case before you're humanely removed from the game.
You do not have the right to hoard anything that can be used to eliminate human suffering, without making the logical case for the temporary restriction of its use as being a more efficient way to ensure the elimination of human suffering.
You do not have the right to create real human suffering to ease the imaginary suffering of the insane. A child being forced to make sneakers is a Crime against Humanity. A human being forced to do anything they don't want to do when what they want to do isn't hurting anyone else, is a Crime against Humanity. Your imagined sensibilities and delusional and illogical feelings are insane and a Crime against Humanity. You cannot protect your children from trauma by giving traumatised insane people the power to traumatise your children. If you do not understand that, you do not have the sanity to function let alone create a healthy life. There is nothing traumatic in this world that isn't made to be traumatic by the traumatised imbeciles who give traumatic illusions their power to hurt imaginations. If you and your toddler come across roadkill you are insane if you do not use the opportunity to explain what when wrong for that animal or human. There is nothing horrifying about death, but the way to ensure a horrified world of sociopathic killing is to pretend that illogical errors of judgement are a terror that must be feared with panic and trauma that creates horror. If you see a decapitated head, you must explain to the child what the mind of that head thought prior to explaining that the head being severed from the body is not the end of the world but merely the end of the fun for that person.
You do not have the right to impose your fears onto children who are not afraid until you infect them with your insanity. The difference between fear and caution is the difference between insanity and being alert, knowledgeable and aware. Humans who are aware understand the consequences of their actions. They take intelligent risks and they require as much information as possible in order to do that. Humans that are sane have an appreciation of risk. They understand why people take risks (in traffic, unless they're driving an ambulance or racing to a genuine emergency, taking risks is insane - your dumb shit is never worth the risks you take after making a mistake or fucking up your schedule. You imbeciles. If it wasn't important enough not to fuck up, how important can it really be?)
You do not have the right to teach your children what you cannot logically justify and anyone who tells you that your children are your property to do with as you like must receive the most gentle and tender humane attention. Those who told you this lie about the children that belong to an interconnected Humanity are breeders of slaves and self-perpetuating pain.
You do not have the right to create children who are insane. It doesn't matter whether you believe you should have the right, because the product of your insanity will hurt everyone. Your child does not belong to you because you do not have the right to create a ticking time-bomb for Humanity.
We are an interconnected Humanity and there is only one way we will ever again be humane. You must give up all your insane 'rights' because the only right you have and the only right you could possibly want is to live a life free from pain.
The only way that is even possible is if those who will make you suffer from their pain-producing 'opinions' are treated with the utmost gentle humane attention possible. Your 'rights' that they have given you are your chains to pain. You're an imbecile for needing me to explain this simplest of all logical concepts. You're an imbecile if you still cannot understand why you should have the right to cause suffering.
You do not have the right to remain silent. Your Miranda rights are a fucking illusion that hurts everyone. You have the right to be sane. If you have done something insane which has hurt someone who is not yourSelf, you have the right to explain your logic and your motives for why you created pain. If you have done something sane which has not hurt someone who is not yourSelf, no one has the right to legislate against your having fun without hurting anybody. That, you imbeciles, is how Law makes slavery legal. That, you imbeciles, is how the Law makes insanity legal.
You do not have the right to control the actions of others. Convince them of the logical case for why they should act in your mutual best interests without hurting anybody or you must be treated with the most humane and gentle attention possible, in consideration of your insanity.
You do not have the right to override "free will" which is being exercised without hurting anybody else. That is how the breeders of insane slaves kill millions of humans in wars which are, by definition, insane.
You do not have the right to take your illusionary pain and create suffering that is real. If the sound of children laughing bothers you, unless you want to be placed into permanent peace, you will address Your Problem without affecting their fun. If you prevent someone from having fun because you feel something else is more important than fun, and you cannot make the case for why you believe something is more important than fun, you must be treated to with the utmost gentle humane attention. And only the insane have a problem with fun that doesn't hurt anybody else. Fun and Happiness in this corrupted world that is prevented is almost always the action of insanity. In Utopia, everyone will be given BOSE (or a superior brand's) sound-cancelling headphones and light-cancelling eye patches to be worn if they do not wish to participate in fun for whatever reason.
You do not have the right to manipulate humans or to deceive humans or to lie in any fucking way. This is inclusive of:
failure to disclose
'white' lies (lying doesn't get any darker)
lies for politeness sake (nothing is impolite except deception, hurting others or preventing the rights of the sane to act without hurting anyone else - forcing others to consider the insane imaginations of those who get offended by 'inconsiderate' fun, by 'rude' truth or by the 'indecent' failure to consider their emotional insanity is a Crime against Humanity)
lies for diplomatic considerations (it is insane to lie for peace)
lies for social cohesion (your deceitful small talk is a provocation that fairly warrants immediate humane attention for you have disturbed the peace with your insulting unsolicited 'harmless' solicitation - to the insane, the screaming of the solicitors of the world sounds pleasant)
lies to protect (humanity needs to be protected from anyone who would lie to protect anyone from transparency and illumination and reflection - this is a world in which you are presently the victim of countless painfully-obvious Protection Rackets, and the victims of Protection Rackets are always too stupid to understand that humans only ever need protection from Those Who Would Make Them Afraid).
You do not have the right to imagine you could be happy by making another person suffer.
You do not have the right to tolerate suffering - even self-inflicted - which was intended to 'please' you.
You do not have the right to be stupid. Stupidity is defined as believing you have the right to create suffering for "the greater good". You cannot be as stupid as those brilliant but corrupted minds who control the entire world. They create suffering telling themselves it's for the best. They are not willing to make the logical case for how this can even be possible. They are creeps who are victims of a very sick corruption which denies the rights of human beings to live without pain.
The fundamental right of Humanity is to permanently exist in an neutral or happier state.
You do not have the right to be a snivelling Toddler who doesn't care about your own best Interests.
You do not have the right to believe what has been proven false.
You do not have the right to your Faith if your Faith is not in the best interests of Humanity. Asserting, for example, that the words written in the 31st chapter of the Holy Bible's book of Numbers are the words of anything other than a sociopathic demonic victim of insanity and pain would give you the right to be attended to instantly with the most humane and gentle tenderness your insanity permits.
You do not have the right to Freedom of Evil Mysticism.
You do not have the right to print and publish Insanity that asserts that suffering is ever okay.
You do not have the right to tolerate those who claim they have the right to hurt other people.
We are an Interconnected Humanity and almost all of you imbeciles have failed Logic 101.
You do not have the right to make others suffer in order to Please you. You couldn't possibly be that evil and yet you are. This is ignorance blurred with insanity. You cannot control humans and be simultaneously sane. You will never be happy creating misery; what imbeciles could even imagine such a thing.
You do not have the right to be narcissistic. You couldn't possibly be so stupid as to think those around you cannot affect your happiness or inflict pain. If you believe this you are insane. How can everyone have screwed up Logic this horribly?
In a world of neutrality, you would not be compelled to push forward but you would not be permitted to pull back on Humanity. Anyone may 'anchor' themselves in Neutral to allow themselves to be swept forward by the sheer physics of progress. Newton's Third Law of Motion: To every action there is always an equal and opposite reaction. If the entire population of Utopia rested weightlessly in Neutral, a single man, woman or child could could take a single step forward for themSelves and all of Utopia would progress.
Utopia is the most Selfish world a sane person can imagine. For this reason, all of Humanity cares about all of Humanity because any human being is both a potential source of happiness and a potential source of suffering. In Utopia, everyone primarily loves themSelves. For this reason, all of Humanity is intelligently loved. We are one race. One species. One Humanity. One Love.
In Utopia there is no Selflessness, no Messiahs, no martyrs, no Self-sacrifice, no Pity, no Compassion, no Coercion, no Pressure, no one imagines they should force another person to do anything; everyone only cares about themSelves. If you're a Selfless sort of person, you'd be miserable in such a Selfish world.
There is no justice in reality and Utopia would be the literal embodiment of all that is real. If you prevented someone from doing something they wanted to do, even if you grabbed their arm and prevented them from taking a single step forward, you would need a reason that was instantly acceptable and understandable. If the reason was not in their interests, like - for example - if they were no longer amused by your insanity and no longer believed there was comedic value in listening to your earnest delusions, only for you to prevent them from continuing on your way, all of Utopia would stop what they were doing and pay attention for as long as necessary until the threat (that would be you) has been humanely Rested In Peace.
There would be no horror, merely attentiveness. No scorn, no pity, no contempt, no derision. Unemotional alertness to the danger of Insanity which would never be feared beyond fearing the fear Insanity (left unattended) creates.
Would it be possible to derive the "white bible" from your post above?
Like take the ideas and philosophies you espouse and intertwine them into a book with stories for modern times which read much like the bible (except not meant to mentallly exploit human beings) but actually are meant to develop and cultivate healthy SANE human beings from day 1?
I believe this can be done. I used to call it the "anti-bible" but that's horrible.
"The White Book" is more like it, at least for a start.
Linear Mode
