Premium Poker Content

[Hillbilly Jim]

i dont know why anyone would play anything other than rush poker

regular poker is for old guys with heart conditions and low self esteem

rush poker is for alpha males

[Hillbilly Jim]

alpha male shit right here dawgs

Dealer: Hand #17856584334
Dealer: Neil Tome has 8 seconds left to act
Dealer: scsmith986 shows four of a kind, Nines
Dealer: Dr Sam Beckett shows a straight flush, Jack high
Dealer: Dr Sam Beckett wins the pot ($18.05) with a straight flush, Jack high

[SkyNigger]

Rush and Stars' answer to Rush will change online poker forever.

[anatine]

My answer to online poker will change rush and Star's answer to rush forever.

[Hillbilly Jim]

let the record show that that fella flopped quads to my open ended straight flush draw and i got it on th river sfo

then after droppind fow stakes,had to getout of the noslbee, some nmbnuts beat my steal wheel with a fuck 6 hugh straight flush his faggoy ass got on the river

[SkyNigger]

There is hella widespread talk [from sources not known to be susceptible to 'conspiracy theories' or 'scandal' or even 'cynicism'] that there appears to be an inordinately ridiculous amount of Wow hands being made on their tables.

These are people who've played 2 million or w/e online hands at FTP and elsewhere. Not exactly hysterical types.

Personally, I have zero problem with RNGs designed to create 'action' or 'setup' hands - so long as the RNG doesn't favour particular players, I'll adjust. But is it intriguing all the same...imo. Which is > your opinion.

Cliffnotes: I'm looking forward to hitting some hella big hands when they [eventually] bring in MSNL.

[blake]

Quote:

Originally Posted by DakotaBurnsInHell

There is hella widespread talk [from sources not known to be susceptible to 'conspiracy theories' or 'scandal' or even 'cynicism'] that there appears to be an inordinately ridiculous amount of Wow hands being made on their tables.

These are people who've played 2 million or w/e online hands at FTP and elsewhere. Not exactly hysterical types.

Personally, I have zero problem with RNGs designed to create 'action' or 'setup' hands - so long as the RNG doesn't favour particular players, I'll adjust. But is it intriguing all the same...imo. Which is > your opinion.

Cliffnotes: I'm looking forward to hitting some hella big hands when they [eventually] bring in MSNL.

This has completely been my experience as well. Literally 100% of the time I have an overpair, the other guy has a set. Or vice-versa. But it is one or the other.

[mama luigi]

thats poker folks

Comments

solid